By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The confrontation is aimed at earlier political decisions that established high fine rates, as well as the procedural situation where the current minister must defend a draft bill prepared by their predecessor. The criticism is indirect and policy-based, emphasizing the consequences of the government's actions for the citizens.

The confrontation is aimed directly at the Prime Minister, criticizing his personal conduct (the use of his official car) in light of the goals of the green transition. The criticism is behavioral rather than political.

The primary opposition is directed against the policy of the Prime Minister and the governing coalition regarding the revocation of voting rights. The criticism is both political and fact-based, calling into question the foundation of the Prime Minister's previous arguments and labeling the proposed move as short-sighted.

The primary opponents are the coalition led by the Reform Party (Reform Party, Eesti 200, Social Democrats), which is facing sharp criticism over tax hikes and failed crisis management. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of breaking promises made before the elections and dipping into people’s pockets. The opposition is intense, leveling accusations that the government is serving the interests of the wealthier segment of society.

Criticism is directed at the state’s administrative capacity, which has left teachers without a salary supplement. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the state’s inability to meet its financial obligations in a timely manner.

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party for initiating the draft bill and at the political uncertainty represented by Jüri Ratas's change of stance and the Social Democrats' potential shift in position. The criticism is sharp, focusing on the legal inadequacy of the bill and the fundamental change in political viewpoints.

The main criticism is directed at the state and the Ministry of Education and Research, citing administrative delays and the failure to deliver promised salary increases. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the ministry's inability to verify and process data in a timely fashion. The confrontation is intense because this is fundamentally an issue of teacher support.