By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The opposition is not aimed at individuals, but rather targets the government's potential inaction or ambiguity concerning the inclusion of Estonian entrepreneurs. The criticism is procedural and political, requiring the government to outline the planning for the development of concrete measures and provide clear answers.

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, who are being criticized for shifting responsibility onto others and for insufficient action in mitigating the economic crisis. Separately, the government's plan to take even more money from people through a car tax is highlighted. The criticism is directed at the government's political activities and priorities.

Criticism is directed against the submitter of the draft bill (The Honorable Jaak) regarding the inaccuracy of the explanatory memorandum. The objection is both procedural and policy-based, demanding clarity in defining the scope of student loan recipients, particularly concerning EU citizens.

The confrontation is aimed at the government's political decisions, especially the abolition of free public transport, the usefulness of which is widely doubted. The criticism is policy-driven, demanding a detailed and public analysis of the reforms' impacts (including passenger numbers and the actual benefit derived by the state).