By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The rhetorical style is formal, businesslike, and at times insistent, emphasizing the seriousness of the economic situation and the relevance of the topic. When responding to the minister, the tone is polite and appreciative ("it is very pleasant to see that you have delved into the questions, that is truly super"), but the questions themselves are precise and demand specific logistical answers. Logical appeals are employed, relying on economic data and facts.

The rhetorical style is urgent and anxious, emphasizing the socio-economic catastrophe and the question of survival. The speaker balances the emotional appeal (pensioners, the choice between food and medicine) with a logical and constructive political proposal. Although critical, the speaker attempts to avoid being labeled a populist and presents a detailed solution.

The discourse is formal, procedural, and interrogative, focusing on accuracy and the verification of legislation. The style is logical, requiring the opposing party to provide specific references to the text of the draft law to avoid ambiguity. The salutation "Austatud Jaak" indicates a polite yet demanding tone.

The rhetorical style is formal, critical, and demanding, expressing sorrow and confusion regarding the usefulness of the reforms. Direct questions are employed, and the minister's previous statements are quoted to emphasize the ambiguity and demand specific data and the results of the analysis.