By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, sharply criticizing the healthcare budget cuts and the minister’s personal role on the Health Insurance Fund council. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the minister of ignorance and shirking responsibility. An ironic solution is also proposed to the opposing side (the ministry’s own salary cuts and layoffs).

There is insufficient data.

The confrontation is directed at the minister and the security tax bill currently being processed by the government. The criticism is strictly policy-based, accusing the draft legislation of failing to meet its intended objective and of being inadequate in guaranteeing security.

The speaker is clearly positioned in the opposition, leveling criticism against the government’s draft bills concerning healthcare funding and qualification requirements for the civil service. The criticism is substantive, focusing on the social risks and the diminishing value of education, and directly challenging the ministers on the necessity of the proposed changes.

The opposition is aimed at the current regulation, which prevents the construction of communication masts on the road right-of-way, noting that the state rejected this proposal about a decade ago. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.