By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The political stance is sharply critical of the government's actions, particularly concerning healthcare funding, where they oppose the 10% budget cuts, viewing them as a risk to public health. Contradictions in national security policy are also highlighted, specifically supporting the restriction of Russian influence (MPEÕK) while criticizing the inability to assist those who renounce Russian citizenship. The focus remains on policy effectiveness and ministerial accountability.

The political stance focuses on the deficit in social infrastructure (care homes) and the necessity of state support for local governments. This position strongly advocates for investments by local municipalities, especially given the long waiting lists for the service and the projected future demand. This constitutes a policy- and results-driven approach that emphasizes the accessibility of public services.

The political focus is on funding national defense and the adequacy of the security tax. The speaker takes a strong, policy-driven stance, citing a minister's previous statement that the bill currently under consideration is flawed and fails to fully meet security requirements. This position is provocative and demands that the government provide clarity.

The political stance is directed at criticizing government bills, focusing specifically on social consequences and the rising cost of living. The speaker opposes raising healthcare service fees, especially those affecting young children, and questions the proposed easing of the legal education requirement for the State Secretary and local secretaries. The criticism is primarily results-oriented, emphasizing the risk that people will be unable to receive timely medical care.

The political position focuses on the need to amend infrastructure regulation in order to improve internet connectivity on trains. We strongly support the proposal put forward by communications companies to allow the construction of communication masts within the road right-of-way, highlighting the illogical nature of the current regulation (specifically, the distinction made between electricity and communication masts). This is a policy- and results-based approach.