By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition and the Prime Minister (Kaja Kallas), criticizing their budget policy and the introduction of new taxes. The criticism is intense, accusing the coalition of robbing ordinary people through taxation and labeling potential cuts a crime. Criticism is also directed at procedural matters, particularly the rushed decision concerning the nuclear power plant.

The confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition, specifically targeting the contradictory stances of the Reform Party and the Social Democrats regarding layoffs and wage hikes. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of failing to find adequate solutions for the salary issues facing essential workers. The objective is to expose the internal tensions and instability within the government.

The criticism targets a specific provision of the draft bill, not individuals, and expresses concern regarding the political outcome (competition in offering cheaper food). There is no sign of direct confrontation or the preclusion of compromise.

The main criticism is directed at the banking sector due to its significant profits at a time when many societal groups are facing economic hardship. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, immediately proposing a countermeasure in the form of a temporary solidarity tax. The waitress is called upon to support this measure, referencing her previous position as the Director General of the Tax Board.

The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education and Research and the minister, who is accused of shifting responsibility for failures onto other parties. The criticism is intense and focuses on the minister's personal accountability and political performance, naming the circle of culprits (local governments, previous ministers, the Centre Party, school principals, teachers).

The opposition is directed against the government’s proposed sugary drink tax. The criticism leveled against the initiators of the statement is procedural, centering on the fact that they failed to find the time or opportunity to meet with representatives of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, which suggests inadequate preparatory work.