By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The political stance is firmly directed against regressive taxes (such as the sugar and car tax), highlighting the need to protect ordinary citizens. The most prominent issue is the restoration of state funding for extracurricular activities to its previous level. The attitude towards the government’s actions is critical, particularly concerning budget management and the hurried implementation of major projects (like the nuclear power plant).

The political stance heavily focuses on the government's fiscal policy and public sector layoffs, highlighting the internal coalition conflicts between the Reform Party and the Social Democrats. The speaker questions the government's ability to ensure essential service providers (police officers, rescue workers, teachers) an adequate salary level amid austerity measures. The stance is highly critical of the government's priorities, which fail to ensure the security of frontline workers.

The political focus centers on the implementation details of education and social policy at the local government level. A cautious, policy-driven position is being put forward, highlighting the risk that unhealthy competition could emerge among municipal kindergartens, potentially compromising food quality. This position aims to preempt a potential weak spot within the draft legislation.

The most prominent issue is the banks' exceptionally large profits, driven by the rise in Euribor, and the contrast this presents against the economic hardships faced by society. The political position strongly favors implementing a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector. This stance is heavily value-driven, underscoring the injustice of the situation.

The most prominent issue is the question of the Ministry of Education and Research's actions and accountability. The speaker sharply criticizes the failed implementation of the transition to Estonian-language instruction and demands an explanation from the minister regarding the legal basis. The stance is strongly oppositional and focuses on evaluating the government's performance and demanding accountability.

Politically, the speaker opposes the sugary drink tax, preferring instead that the government focus its efforts on supporting recreational sports in schools. He also voiced strong skepticism regarding the declaration of the Moscow Patriarchate as an institution supporting aggression, stressing the necessity of understanding the viewpoints of local church representatives. His approach is policy-driven, centered on the benefit of actions to society.