By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the minister, who face criticism for their insufficient grasp of reality, their neglect of the employment situation in Ida-Virumaa, and their ineffective investment priorities. The criticism is policy-driven, specifically questioning the government's capacity to guarantee both lower electricity prices and energy security.

The confrontation is directed against the minister (a representative of the government), whose claims regarding the improvement of the situation are being refuted by concrete data. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing on the ministry's inability to ensure the availability of qualified teachers.

The main opponents are the governing coalition and the social democrats, who are sharply criticized for their unfair policies and irresponsible conduct. The criticism is directed at political choices that burden consumers and ignore local solutions (CCS technology). The intensity of the opposition is high, accusing the government of choosing the easiest, yet most unjust, path.

The criticism is directed at the Ministry of Social Affairs and the minister for their inaction concerning the consolidation of outdated IT systems and the management of the Health Insurance Fund's deficit. This opposition is grounded in policy and performance, stressing that the current fragmentation and lack of funding jeopardize the quality of care provided by medical institutions and threaten the payroll for healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the burdensome effect of new requirements (E-ITS) on already understaffed IT teams is specifically emphasized.

The main opponents are coalition politicians and the Social Democratic Party (SDE), who are blamed for the decline of the oil shale sector. The criticism is intense and is aimed at political inaction (specifically, the failure to implement CCS), directly linking SDE policy to the worsening problems faced by Narva residents. Opposition was also voiced against the actions of Narva Mayor Katri Raik, which were deemed contradictory to her party position.

The criticism targets the government's policy, which seeks to achieve 100% reliance on renewable energy at any cost, while completely ignoring the associated expenses and reliable alternatives. A clear contrast is drawn with politicians who fail to address the high cost of green energy and neglect to mention that major global powers (China, India, Russia, USA) have not joined the climate agreement. This criticism is policy-driven and intense, issuing a warning against irresponsible destruction.