By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The criticism is aimed at senior politicians in Stenbock House and the ministries, who are sending negative signals to families, particularly concerning the planned car tax. The opposition is based on values and policy, not personal animosity. He/She also criticizes the rigid approach taken by officials regarding name change issues.

Criticism is directed at the government's inaction (e.g., the lack of plans for judicial reform) and the specific cut decisions made by previous governments. Specifically highlighted is the 101,000 euro reduction in support for extracurricular activities for large families, which was aimed at families in rural areas. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, demanding clear steps and a vision.

Direct opponents are not criticized, but the narrow approach to the tax issue presented by the rapporteur is challenged. The criticism is directed at the scope of the policy and the fact that the issues are treated solely as a tax matter, rather than as a comprehensive solution.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the policies of the governing coalition, sharply criticizing cuts to family benefits, the implementation of the car tax, and the seizure of 25,000 people's accounts. The criticism is both political (the budget deficit in the Health Insurance Fund, wasteful spending by the Ministry of Climate) and value-based (the suspicion of fraud leveled against pregnant women). He/She also criticizes the media outlet Ekspress for unfairly attacking the policy area that supports mothers with many children.

The primary criticism is directed towards the Minister of Finance and the government’s budget policy, alongside the priorities of the Health Insurance Fund’s leadership. The critique is strictly policy-based, focusing on fiscal irresponsibility and the inefficient spending of public money. The speaker questions how Parliament can responsibly approve a deficit budget.

The main opponent is the Minister of Education, whose actions are sharply criticized regarding both policy (specifically, the organization of exams) and management style (the ignoring of feedback). The speaker accuses the minister of deeming feedback from educators and parents "unimportant" and failing to conduct the necessary analyses. The criticism is intense and centers on the minister's inability to listen and resolve issues.