By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman
Total Sessions: 6
Fully Profiled: 6
2025-10-22
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Expresses strong support and warmly recommends endorsing the draft legislation introduced by colleagues, noting a willingness to cooperate on matters of family policy. Addresses the Minister to seek assistance and counsel in resolving a specific citizen's administrative issue. Emphasizes the necessity of supporting parenthood "all together."
2025-10-22
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker bases their political proposals on expert analyses and models of previous policy implementation (for example, Liisa Pakosta's equality policy). Efforts are made to establish a dialogue with the minister, even when the questions are demanding, and satisfaction is expressed regarding the constructive nature of the discussion.
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker actively promotes collaboration among various policy domains (regional, social, and tax policy). He/She emphasizes that issues can only be resolved through cooperation with other sectors.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Although the speaker is in opposition, he acknowledges the Minister of Social Affairs for her competence in the healthcare sector and praises the Ministry of Social Affairs officials for upholding the constitution. He sees the need for a cross-party agreement regarding special welfare services and issues concerning family caregivers. He refers to cooperation with colleagues (e.g., Tanel Kiik, Aivar Kokk) in the Social Affairs Committee and at the rostrum.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient information
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates cooperation by supporting the concerns raised by colleagues (Ester Karuse, Jaak Aab) and pointing out that the Social Democrats had essentially submitted an interpellation on the very same subject. This cooperation is manifested through the presentation of shared critical positions regarding the organization of education, indicating broader dissatisfaction within the opposition.