By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

It opposes measures that increase the financial burden on families, such as the car tax, which sends a negative signal. It supports cheap or financially neutral signals provided by the state (such as showing appreciation or observing flag days) that recognize parenthood as work. Furthermore, it criticizes the financial burden placed on a young person with a difficult background when they have to take the state to court.

Economic perspectives focus on the financial management of demographic shifts within the education sector. There is a demand that surplus funds generated by providing services to smaller generations should be reserved for services aimed at families with children, rather than being redirected towards other policy areas. Opposition is voiced against specific social cuts that negatively impact the financial stability and coping ability of families.

Economic considerations center on utilizing tax policy to achieve regional and social objectives. Preference is given to measures that provide an advantage to local farmers and support access to fresh food.

He/She strongly supports social spending and direct financial support for families, demanding that the surplus funds (11 million euros) be directed toward the sector of children and families. He/She opposes punitive taxes (such as the car tax) and criticizes methods used to seize people's bank accounts. He/She supports measures that improve the economic participation of informal caregivers in the labor market by offering them state-guaranteed health insurance.

The speaker emphasizes fiscal discipline and accountability, strongly opposing persistent budget deficits, especially those lacking a long-term solution. Criticism is also leveled at the efficiency of public sector spending, specifically questioning the allocation of tens of thousands of euros for executive recruitment when funds for core operations are simultaneously lacking.

Insufficient data.