By Months: Riina Solman

Not enough data.

The economic views expressed are socially sensitive and redistributive, standing in opposition to tax policies that favor the "wealthier segment" and harm "low-income earners." They demand halting the decline in purchasing power, boosting domestic consumption, and allocating the budget surplus (which results from low birth rates) toward family support benefits.

His/Her economic views are right-wing, supporting the private sector while demanding affordability and quality in social services. He/She is strongly opposed to tax hikes, arguing that they fuel inflation and poverty, and criticizes the abolition of the tax hump, which primarily benefits higher earners. He/She calls for a review of funding models to prevent the owners of management companies from lining their pockets at the expense of care homes.

Strongly opposed to tax increases, arguing that these (VAT, income tax, and excise duties) directly harm people's livelihoods and the poorer segments of society. They advocate for clarity and control over the state budget and criticize the spending of billions on the "green transition" and the "swamping of territories." They support the financial strengthening of local governments by returning the personal income tax percentage to the pre-crisis level and allocating them a share of the corporate income tax.

The speaker is strongly opposed to tax hikes, accusing the government of exacerbating inflation and eroding people's purchasing power. He demands that the state guarantee affordable electricity prices and criticizes the elimination of the "tax hump," which will cause a 500 million euro shortfall in the state budget. Economic stability and consumer well-being are prioritized.

The speaker is vehemently opposed to tax hikes, specifically criticizing the proposed VAT and car taxes as measures that erode the financial security of families. He advocates for supporting family incomes—through indexation and tax benefits—and criticizes the government’s planned tax reform for its lack of social justice, noting that it primarily benefits high earners. Furthermore, he criticizes the state’s actions regarding the liberalization of the second pension pillar, defending the public’s right to determine the fate of their own savings.

Economic perspectives are critical of tax hikes and the increased administrative burden placed on businesses, opposing the regional minister's plan to require the labeling of raw material origin. The speaker opposes subsidized energy projects (offshore wind farms), which generate profit for selected businesses, but whose costs (including infrastructure protection) are ultimately borne by the taxpayer.

Strongly opposes raising taxes (income tax, car tax), as this diminishes the economic security of families and pensioners. Supports tax incentives and financial assistance for families with children, considering any cuts to be irresponsible. Criticizes the government's policies that make it harder for people to make ends meet.