By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Economic considerations focus on the transparency and allocation of energy project costs. The speaker is worried about how the expenses related to the damage, repair, and protection of subsea cables will affect the price of energy. They question whether these costs should be passed directly onto the energy price or who should bear the expense, hinting at resistance to burdening consumers.

The economic perspectives relate to supporting livestock farmers and protecting them from damage caused by predators, specifically those who are "struggling with predators." This highlights the need to safeguard economic activity in rural areas and ensure the livelihood of their residents.

The speaker does not present economic views but stresses that political decisions should not be dictated by market conditions. He/She deplores the behavior of political parties motivated by pandering to voters rather than by constitutional values.

Economic perspectives concern the role of state funding in academic autonomy, emphasizing that because universities are state-funded, this grants a member of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) the right to intervene in the consideration of ethical and political decisions. Broader economic themes (taxes, trade) are absent.

There is not enough data.

The economic views expressed are fiscally critical and focused on protecting the taxpayer. The speaker opposes massive subsidies (€2.6 billion) that benefit selected businesses and criticizes both tax increases and the removal of tax benefits for families. It is stressed that the Estonian people are essentially paying themselves into poverty, and questions are raised regarding the inclusion of infrastructure defense costs in the price of energy.

There's not much data.