By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The main opposition is directed against the actions of the minister and the government concerning the establishment of offshore wind farms, criticizing both procedural ambiguity and the substance of the policy. The criticism is intense, demanding clarification regarding the basis for the uncertain calculations and the unexpected suspension of the project. No readiness for compromise is evident; the focus remains on demanding accountability.

The criticism is aimed at the rapporteur and the ministry for their inaction or slowness in advancing the legislative process, which leaves rural residents without security. The criticism is policy- and procedure-focused, demanding an explanation as to why the threat posed by one type of predator is considered more important than another. The speaker expects to receive the same response that was given to Kert Kingo.

The main opponents are the Centre Party and the Social Democrats, who face sharp criticism for political opportunism and for holding the Russian-speaking electorate hostage. The criticism is political and value-based, accusing them of destabilizing national security or contributing to such destabilization. The speaker categorically rejects the assertions that revoking voting rights offends people or increases destabilization.

The primary criticism is aimed at Mart Kalm, the former rector of EKA, for his political decision and his defense of it, which has fostered anti-Semitic sentiments within the university. Indirect criticism is also leveled at the Ministry of Education for procedural delays in responding to an information request, and at Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna for siding with Palestine in UN votes. The criticism is intense and values-driven.

The main opponents are Priit Lomp and those opposition/coalition members who are accused of underestimating Russia's security threats. The criticism directed at Priit Lomp is both personal and procedural, accusing him of "shady dealings" for demanding money for the Kastre municipality kindergarten from the rescue teams' budget.

The main opposition is aimed squarely at the prime minister and three coalition leaders, who are being criticized for their decision-making procedure (specifically, ignoring parliament and the cabinet). Furthermore, the leaders of the previous government (Kaja Kallas and the Minister of Social Protection) are also facing sharp criticism for damaging family security and confidence. The criticism is twofold—both procedural and substantive—and calls into question whether the government even has a program.

The main confrontation is between the Foreign Minister and colleague Sutrop, whose positions regarding the impact of the UN vote are considered frivolous and irresponsible. The criticism is directed at the political assessment and inaction in the field of cyber defense, demanding concrete measures.