By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The speaker demonstrates expertise in energy, environmental impact assessment, and risks associated with maritime security. They reference specific studies (University of Tartu scientists) and employ technical terminology (e.g., "audit firm Aurora," "state aid permit application"). Particular emphasis is placed on issues concerning the survival of fish schools and the sustainability of fisheries.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of both previous legislative initiatives (such as the draft bill on dangerous dogs by party colleague Raimond Kaljulaid) and the ministry's stance on the importance of the predator issue. The analysis focuses on the practical impact of rural safety and damage caused by predators, highlighting a specific example of a child encountering wolves on their way to school.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in security policy, geopolitics, and recent Estonian history, particularly concerning the events of the 2007 Bronze Soldier crisis. They draw comparisons with other European countries regarding the voting rights of non-citizens and reference the organization of elections in the Russian Federation, as well as voter turnout in Estonia. This expertise is further bolstered by a reference to their previous work as an advisor to the Minister of Defense and their personal Ingrian-Finnish heritage.

The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the internal conflict and timeline at EKA (Estonian Academy of Arts), referencing specific dates, individuals (Mart Kalm, Jonathan Ventura, Julia Maria Künnap), and documents (the Sirp article). This knowledge centers on the ethical boundaries concerning the autonomy of educational institutions and state funding, as well as the rise of antisemitic sentiments within the academic setting. The speaker also differentiates between the use of "antisemitic" and "anti-Zionist" terminology.

The speaker establishes authority on security issues by referencing warnings issued by Kapo (the Estonian Internal Security Service) and citing specific examples (Deniss Metsavas, Novichok, and cable sabotage). They explain how Russian agencies compromise and coerce people traveling from Estonia to Russia into cooperation. The Finnish model of openly addressing risk scenarios is used as a comparison.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the financing of the energy sector (subsidies, infrastructure vulnerability) and demography. Specific data is utilized (a population decrease of 5,000, 2.6 billion euros allocated for wind farms), and references are made to family policy experts and Finnish initiatives. Special emphasis is placed on factoring the costs of protecting and improving infrastructure into the price of energy.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the consequences of foreign policy, hybrid warfare, and cyber influence operations, connecting these topics with social research. He refers to specific sources, such as feedback from the local Jewish community and a study on delinquent behavior among minors, to substantiate his claims. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding how influence activities and criminal offenses are migrating to the web.