By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Economic viewpoints emphasize the transparency and accountability of state funding, particularly concerning subsidies for media outlets. There is opposition to using state funds to purchase political loyalty, requiring clear criteria and conditions for the allocation of these grants.

The economic views are strongly opposed to taxes and state liabilities, arguing that they increase expenditures for both individuals and businesses, thereby contradicting the promise to end the 'tax festival.' The platform favors the continued role of private firms in service provision rather than municipal intervention, supporting overall cost reduction.

The economic views only mention the handling of competition law, criticizing its previous neglect and highlighting its current diligent enforcement. Specific positions regarding taxes or expenditures are lacking.

Economic considerations relate to the financial needs of the healthcare sector. It is noted that potential savings were mentioned during the discussions of the bill, but it is emphasized that the money saved should be used to improve other treatment options.

Insufficient data

Not enough data

The speaker is a staunch opponent of tax hikes, calling them drivers of inflation and a means of taking a billion euros out of people's pockets. He advocates easing the tax burden on working individuals, restoring tax benefits for families with children, and preserving the tax exemption for land beneath one's home. Economic policy should focus on restoring competitiveness and supporting low-income individuals and families.

Economic perspectives emphasize boosting productivity and competitiveness, requiring the state to take an active role in correcting errors. The speaker strongly advocates for valuing STEM subjects and engineering professions, as these guarantee high salary prospects and numerous job opportunities for young people.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, particularly regarding the reversal of excise duty increases, in order to curb inflation and ensure people have more disposable income. The government's tax policy is criticized, and calls are made for alternative funding sources, citing the Reform Party's plan to abolish the 'tax hump' as a potential area for savings.

Economic arguments support increased state funding for local municipalities to alleviate their financial shortfalls. It is stressed that local governments face significant social care costs due to the aging population, leading to a scarcity of resources for infrastructure upkeep. This stance advocates for channeling resources to ensure the sustainability of the regional economy and the continued presence of the population.

The speaker identifies as a member of a right-wing party who supports the private sector and motivated entrepreneurs. However, he criticizes the current system where the profit margins of nursing home operators are disproportionate to the affordability of the service, suggesting that the system favors profits over accessibility. He calls for a reassessment of the funding model.