By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

There is a complete lack of any reference to cooperation or seeking compromise; the speaker is strictly in a critical and interrogative role toward the representatives of the government and the Finance Committee. The objective is to obtain concrete answers and prevent political corruption.

Expresses support for and good cooperation with the security institutions in the past, but stresses that when mistakes occur, it is fundamental that they are acknowledged and corrected. He/She refers to the questions raised by colleagues (Aivar Kokk, Priit Sibul) regarding the waste reform, demonstrating cooperation within the parliamentary group. Demands honest information from the Minister of the Interior, while being prepared to accept the answers, provided they are accurate.

Cooperation is shown with fellow opposition members, thanking Anti Allas for introducing a new perspective into competition law. The stance towards the government is strict and uncompromising, accusing them of sidestepping criticism regarding the actions of their coalition partners.

He/She supports the opinion of colleague Priit Sibul concerning the title of the draft bill. He/She notes that the Social Affairs Committee has heard all participants and experts, demonstrating an openness to listening to various viewpoints, although he/she personally remains cautious regarding the bill itself.

Insufficient data

The speaker is actively engaged in dialogue with the rapporteur, seeking solutions to improve judicial proceedings through the involvement of an independent expert. Information concerning cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu is unavailable.

The speaker operates in close cooperation with their fellow faction members (submitting an interpellation) and refers to other colleagues (Lauri Laats) when addressing the topic, which demonstrates cooperation within the opposition. Seeking compromises or cooperation with the government is not mentioned; instead, the opposition to the government's activities is emphasized.

The speaker expresses strong support and thanks to the presenter, whose address contained a wealth of good advice, and hopes for its widespread distribution. This indicates a readiness to support individuals and ideas that offer constructive solutions.

The style of cooperation is pragmatic, expressing support for sound bills and helping to bring them into the legislative process to prevent them from being shelved. Although communication with the coalition is confrontational, the speaker engages directly in dialogue with colleagues (e.g., Social Democrat Aivar).

Insufficient data

The speaker demonstrates openness to cooperation, agreeing with and supporting the views of Helmen Kütt (likely a representative of another political party) regarding the reform and quality of care homes. He/She actively participates in inter-ministerial working groups and committee meetings, although remaining skeptical about their overall effectiveness.