By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Economic perspectives emphasize the need to halt the decline in purchasing power and boost domestic consumption. The objective is to achieve the level of economic growth and prosperity that neighboring countries have managed to maintain or increase, pointing to the necessity of changing the current economic strategy.

Supports the central redistribution of income to local governments through financial instruments, seeing this as part of supporting rural areas. It views the depopulation of rural areas as an economic problem that increases state costs.

Supports the increase in social spending for families, emphasizing that due to the low birth rate, funds (10–11 million) are left over in the education and social sectors, and this money should be redirected into family policy. The subject criticizes the previous reduction of family benefits and the introduction of the car tax, arguing that these actions send negative signals to families regarding a lack of stability.

Insufficient data.

Economic views support the reinstatement of targeted social and family benefits, especially for large families. It is emphasized that the state has an obligation to signal support to people in difficult financial circumstances, finding the necessary funds for this from the budget that remains due to unborn children.

Economic positions are strongly focused on social justice and income redistribution, opposing tax policies that favor the wealthy. It supports directing the state's surplus funds toward increasing family benefits to improve the livelihood of low-wage earners. It questions the government's assessment of the state's financial abundance and demands its quantification.

The economic views focus on fair compensation for personnel in national defense, demanding the reallocation of defense budget funds to ensure a motivating salary system for lower-level employees. The speaker criticizes the system where pay raises only reach management, which demonstrates a strong commitment to labor welfare.

The speaker opposes tax increases (car tax, income tax) and damaging the state budget, criticizing the plan to abolish the tax hump as a 500 million euro loss to the national treasury. He defends liberal principles in savings management, specifically advocating for the liberalization of the second pension pillar. In his view, economic policy should support the financial security of families and prevent the deepening of poverty.