By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Not enough data

Economic perspectives emphasize prioritizing local labor (NEET youth) over foreign workers. The introduction of foreign labor is viewed negatively, as it requires additional funding to manage mass immigration and sidelines our own people from the job market. Measures that encourage our youth to enter the labor market are supported.

Economic positions emphasize the necessity of utilizing domestic resources to prevent rising electricity prices and halt the country's impoverishment. This stance opposes the support of renewable energy, arguing that it is associated with high costs and the deterioration of the nation's economic situation.

The speaker stresses the necessity of addressing economic revitalization and criticizes the government for wasting valuable time on bureaucracy during a period of tax increases and other pressing issues. They are vehemently opposed to trade with Russia, viewing it as "fattening up" a terror regime and utterly hypocritical.

The economic platform focuses on opposing tax hikes (VAT, car tax) and budget cuts, arguing that these measures severely impact families with children and deepen overall insecurity. It supports indexing and standardizing social benefits to mitigate the risk of poverty and guarantee long-term financial stability. Economic barriers are viewed as the primary reason why families are unable to have the number of children they desire.

The speaker is strongly opposed to tax hikes (VAT, car tax) and cuts to family benefits, viewing these measures as undermining the economic security of families. They support a greater state financial investment in families with children, including indexing benefits and compensating for child-related expenses, to mitigate the rising cost of living. Criticism is leveled against the modification of the income tax exemption, which favors high-income earners at the expense of those with lower wages.

The speaker strongly opposes burdensome tax hikes and views the government's recent proposals as merely cosmetic, lacking substantive impact. They support tax relief and reforms designed to mitigate the effects of inflation on families and pensioners, citing the need for socio-political redistribution.