By Agendas: Priit Sibul

Total Agendas: 128

Fully Profiled: 128

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-16
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
10.

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of the Interior, which has been "critical" of the proposed simplification of gun rights. Furthermore, the speaker casts doubt on the current stance of the prime minister and the government regarding the future resolution of the issue, demanding a clear answer.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
Border Infrastructure, the Saatse Boot, and the Protection Zone

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The primary criticism is aimed at the Environmental Board and state bureaucracy, which imposes unfair, long-term restrictions (for 75 years) on landowners without consulting them. Criticism is also leveled at the excessive zeal of former colleague Sutt in establishing these restrictions, labeling this procedural criticism "neo-nationalization." The speaker also questions the rationality of the state's conduct in a security context, given that the state treats its own citizens in this manner.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-14
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main confrontation is directed against the positions of the minister and the government, criticizing their stance regarding the non-necessity of transparency and language requirements for service providers. The criticism is policy- and value-based, accusing the minister of failing to prioritize consumer awareness and language proficiency.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
First Reading of the Draft Legislation (736 SE) on the Amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act Amending the State Budget Act

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker is clearly adopting an opposition stance, criticizing the government's methods of fiscal management, particularly concerning borrowing and changes to income tax implemented to deliver on election pledges. The critique is both procedural and policy-driven, drawing comparisons between the current administration's actions and the failures of previous governments, while also forecasting future criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and specific ministers (Terras, the Minister of Finance), focusing on inaccuracies in policy implementation and budget execution. Specifically, contradictory funding figures and ineffective projects (such as the Tartu–Riga train) are being scrutinized, but the attacks are fact-based and procedural, rather than personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is aimed at the speed and efficiency of the work performed by the bodies handling the draft legislation (the Finance Committee). The criticism is procedural, citing the unreasonable pace, especially given the early involvement of the Chancellor of Justice.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

There is strong opposition to the economic policy of the government, and particularly the prime minister, concerning tax increases and inflation. The government is criticized for fueling inflation through the VAT increase at a time when the prime minister is simultaneously pointing to excessive commercial space as a problem. The criticism is policy- and results-based, fundamentally questioning the logic behind the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism is directed at the police officials who provided contradictory or inaccurate information regarding the cameras' capabilities while discussing the draft bill in the committee. The opposition is fact-based and focuses on the reliability of official assurances, rather than being a personal attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to abandon the implementation of the Rail Baltic project in Estonia and to withdraw from all international agreements related to the project" (650 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker raises doubts regarding the thoroughness of the planning undertaken by the government or the proposer, specifically concerning the potential international implications. Furthermore, the removal from the budget of investments allocated to Rail Baltic is critically questioned, citing a clear inconsistency in priorities. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker raises questions regarding the impact of the government’s fiscal policy (tax hikes) on inflation. The criticism is aimed at the results of the policy, rather than at specific individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism targets the activities of the state authority—specifically the Environmental Board—alleging procedural shortcomings, such as the disregard of the duty to inform and the imposition of unjust restrictions on landowners.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

There is insufficient data. The criticism is aimed more at overly strict regulatory rules that could impede market opportunities, rather than specific adversaries.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act (654 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker poses questions to the minister, indirectly challenging the thoroughness of the bill’s administrative preparation. The criticism is informative and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary conflict is with Social Minister Karmen Joller, criticizing her handling of the approval of performance bonuses for the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) and the alleged absence of proper oversight. The criticism is procedural, centering on the discrepancy between the substance of the decisions and the public information provided, and challenging the minister's assertion that she was legally constrained and unable to review the decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
On the government's budget plans regarding stimulating the economy and people's purchasing power.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The primary adversary is the minister, whose shifting stance on wage policy is being heavily criticized. The criticism targets the government’s budget decisions concerning the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa), specifically where the inclusion of benefits in the calculation of wages is deemed both unreasonable and inconsistent. The attacks are political and procedural, centered on the judicious use of public money.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main adversary is the minister responsible for the sector, whose report is being criticized for lacking substance and for incompetence. The criticism is intense, focusing on specific procedural (access for the State Audit Office) and performance shortcomings (faulty weapons).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the government coalition, especially Prime Minister Kristen Michal and Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, who are accused of misleading the public regarding the speed of ammunition procurement. The criticism is directed both at political decisions (the security tax, the VAT hike) and at procedural irregularities in the management of the Riigikogu (the supremacy of the decisions made by the session department). The opposition's stance is intense, demanding accountability and explanations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Fierce opposition is aimed squarely at the governing coalition partners, particularly Eesti 200 and the Reform Party, tearing into their tax policies and political hypocrisy. The criticism is both intense and personal, zeroing in on the accountability of specific individuals (Mart, Anti, Jevgeni), inconsistencies during voting procedures, and claims of outright blackmail.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act, the Unemployment Insurance Act, and other related acts, and amending the Disability Support Act (604 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the bill's broader consequences, warning that it could open the door to issues surrounding assisted suicide and euthanasia. The bill's flawed implementation is also being criticized, particularly the vague simple written form and the possibility that the declaration of intent might include elements that the doctor is not required to consider.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition is the minister introducing the reform and the government itself. Criticism targets the substance and procedures of the policy, highlighting the contradiction between the stated goals and the methods used, as well as the unreasonableness of the powers granted to local authorities. The resistance is intense and manifests as deep skepticism regarding the reform's actual benefits.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary conflict is with the Minister of Justice and the coalition partners, whose political values (seeing prison as a social institution) and specific policy decisions (the transfer of Swedish prisoners) are being sharply criticized. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the risks it poses to Estonia.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Second reading of the draft law amending the Health Services Organisation Act, the Unemployment Insurance Act, and other related acts, as well as amending the Act on Support for Working Capacity (604 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the bill's drafting process and the ambiguity of the text, especially regarding the inclusion of non-medical wishes (funerals and spiritual support) in the legislation. [The critic] opposes any interpretation that would link the bill to assisted suicide, stating that they would not support it in any shape or form. The criticism is policy-based and procedural, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed at the Ministry of the Interior due to the lack of clarity regarding the consequences of the law, and at the drafters of the bill, who are proposing disproportionate and merely formal measures. The opposition is also aimed at the manner in which the bill returned by the president was amended, as the changes are formal rather than substantive. The speaker criticizes the state authority's attempt to resolve issues of ecclesiastical law, which fall outside the parliament's competence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Atmosphere Protection Act (393 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary objection targets the approach taken by the government/minister—regulating via regulations—which delegates crucial environmental standards away from the statutory level. The criticism focuses specifically on procedural imprecision and legal ambiguity, issues also highlighted by the Chancellor of Justice. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
The Minister of Public Administration's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session

The standoff is aimed at the minister (the government), criticizing the lack of financial transparency in the policy (the waste reform). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding public cost accounting, not a personal one.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The confrontation is directed against the government's/minister's fiscal policy, primarily criticizing the procedure and timing used to draft the supplementary budget. The criticism is substantive and policy-based, challenging the spending priorities and demanding clarifications regarding the technical details of the budget amendments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is directed against the climate-resilient economy law initiated by the previous government or minister, which is widely regarded as a complete failure. The criticism is extremely intense and personally attacking, calling for the complete scrapping of both the old and the new drafts.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Incident with a naval vessel and a tanker at sea.

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of the Interior, which is accused of having overly rigid regulations and delaying the implementation of necessary ministerial decrees. The criticism targets the ministry's inaction and its political direction, which impedes the development of national capabilities. The opposition is procedural and policy-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Taxes

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The main opponents are the government and Climate Minister Sutt, whose draft legislation is being sharply criticized. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the nationalization of private property and unfair compensation, which essentially amounts to the confiscation of assets.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is aimed at the Minister of Education and Research, criticizing their two years in office and the systemic shortcomings. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, particularly concerning the baffling change to the examination period, which has only created more confusion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Formation of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the circumstances supporting the plan to build offshore wind farms" (586 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the coalition and its negotiation process, the ambiguity surrounding offshore wind farms being the central focus of the inquiry. Criticism is aimed at the lack of political clarity and the necessity of seeking knowledge from the members of the coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition targets the policies of the minister and the government, which are being criticized for violating property rights and implementing unfair procedures (specifically, the actions of the Environmental Board). The speaker sharply dismisses the minister's rhetoric about "equalization," calling it alarming. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, accusing the state of diminishing the value of property.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the minister and the government, who are being criticized for their cavalier attitude and unjust policies. The criticism is intense, labeling the bill as modern nationalization and citing unfair compensation and procedural lack of transparency regarding private owners.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Inquiry regarding the Võru shooting range (no 737)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

Criticism is directed against the lack of transparency in budgeting investments and political appropriation (Anti Allas). Also highlighted is the contradiction in the Social Democrats' positions regarding arms distribution. Opposition is voiced against the concept put forth by the Ministry of the Interior/PPA, which views shooting ranges as narrow "niche products" and leaves the Põlva range without state support.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-12
Hearing regarding the care reform (no 719)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the unfulfilled promises made by the reform leaders (the Social Democrats) and the ministry's failure to find a sensible solution. The opposition is intense and centers on the botched implementation of the policy, which has resulted in local authorities (Tartu) taking the state to court.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the quality of the drafting of the bill and whether the government has managed to address the concerns raised by the Chancellor of Justice and legal scholars. The opposition is procedural and substantive rather than personal, focusing on deficiencies in the lawmaking process.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Drone capability development

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main criticism is aimed at Defense Minister Pevkur (the former Interior Minister), who stands accused of dragging out the border construction project and ordering drones from China while completely ignoring Estonian businesses. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedural issues. Furthermore, doubts have been raised regarding the extent of Prime Minister Michal’s and Liisa-Ly Pakosta’s knowledge concerning secret camera systems, suggesting a lack of transparency.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at obstacles to project execution and procedural deficiencies, such as the inability of the Narva local government to reach an agreement and the lack of clarity regarding Süku’s self-financing. The criticism targets the administrative capacity of the executive branch rather than specific individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the government coalition, which is criticized for pursuing a utopian energy policy that disregards economic costs. Furthermore, the coalition is accused of the creative interpretation of laws, which calls into question the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy and the legislative procedures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Economic Affairs, which is accused of presenting utopian projects and relying on unrealistic calculations. The opposition exists at the policy and procedural level, focusing on the government's failure to provide the public with a clear and reliable energy plan.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the content of the draft bill and its underlying objectives, particularly concerning the fairness and logic of the taxation measures. It highlights a conflict between national defense requirements and tax policy. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, not personal grounds.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the Ministry of the Interior (referring to the ministry led by Läänemets), which, in the speaker's assessment, have created greater confusion, rather than clarity, regarding the name change of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. The opposition is also directed at the solutions proposed in the legal committee's draft bill, which are deemed inadequate and focus solely on formalities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Additional inflow of qualified labor

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition and the prime minister, criticizing their policies for their vagueness and potential negative impact. The criticism targets both the awkward phrasing of the coalition agreement and the absence of specific implementation mechanisms. Specifically, clarification is being demanded in light of the statements made by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-13
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" (557 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

A direct confrontation is not expressed, but the actions or inactions of the World Health Organization (WHO) are indirectly called into question regarding the investigation into the laboratory origin of the virus and the prevention of future incidents.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the lack of clarity and slow execution of government activities, despite the fact that the government's overall political direction has support. In particular, critics point to the ambiguity of the problem being addressed within the context of skilled worker regulations, as well as the prolonged delay in the defense industry investment.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-10
Inquiry Regarding the Procurement of Ammunition (no. 714)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the government, particularly the Minister of Defence, concerning the delays in ammunition procurement and the failure to support the previous proposal to expedite the process. There is also strong opposition to the actions taken by the Ministry of the Interior and environmental protection, which are figuratively described as "harassing" gun owners and hunters. Furthermore, the government's car tax policy is being criticized for contradicting the needs of the Defence Forces.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-10
Inquiry regarding the effects of value-added tax (VAT) increases on the Ministry of Defence's budget (no. 709)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the government's fiscal policy and the resulting consequences for national defense funding. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding accountability and clarification regarding how the tax hike impacts previously planned defense capability development. No personal attacks are being made; instead, the focus remains strictly on the policy's outcomes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the Minister of Climate and the government, criticizing their procedural transparency and the lack of clarity surrounding financial decisions. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on who conducts the consultations and how indexing affects the 2.6 billion euro allocation. The speaker demands clarity as to why adequate figures are missing.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-26
Energetics

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing

The key opponents are the government and its leaders (the prime minister, ministers Ligi and Keldo), along with the Ministry of Climate. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural deficiencies (specifically, the lack of calculations). It also includes direct accusations of lying to the public. The opposition is focused on both policy and procedural levels.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the coalition and the bill's rapporteur, sharply criticizing their understanding and analysis that led to the expansion of voting rights. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, calling into question the logic of the conclusions reached by the Constitutional Committee. The opponents' positions are portrayed as illogical or even dangerous.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the government, who are being criticized both for their political choices (energy, legislation) and for their procedural logic. The opposition is intense, manifesting in a direct question of confidence and the sharp questioning of the government's priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed primarily at the inadequate response of the major European powers (Germany, France, Italy) regarding their understanding of the security situation. There are no references to domestic opponents or personal attacks; the focus is entirely on foreign policy discord.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to enhance migration procedures) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the position of the coalition partner, who has strongly advocated for increasing the quota, a move the speaker firmly opposes. He/She is demanding clarification regarding the status of the coalition's internal debates. The criticism is policy-driven and concerns the public discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

No data available.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the coalition (the Reform Party), citing their overemphasis on budget rules, the delaying of decisions (until 2031), and insufficient commitment in resolving defense issues. The Social Democrats are also criticized for historical proposals to cut defense spending (Padar 2009, Mikser’s proposal to disband the Defense League). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-15
KredEx loan to Nordica in spring 2024.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The primary criticism is directed at the actions of the sitting Prime Minister and the Ministry of Climate concerning their support for Nordica, emphasizing a lack of accountability and the concealment of decisions. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural irregularities and the contradiction between the Prime Minister's public statements and reality. The opponent's actions are described as incompetent ("to reanimate") and contradictory.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-12
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Act on Administrative Cooperation, and the Water Act (531 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the ministry's or government's plans regarding the consolidation of water companies. The criticism is policy-driven, questioning the objectives of the proposed reform and warning that it will result in costs being passed on to consumers. The speaker notes that they have not received an answer anywhere to their questions concerning the reform's objectives.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The standoff is directed against the Economic Affairs Committee and the coalition, who failed to support a more ambitious reduction of the administrative burden, thereby ignoring the joint position held by the Chamber of Commerce and Eesti 200. The criticism targets procedural failure and political inconsistency (specifically, the non-application of the ladder mechanism).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (528 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The resistance is focused on the lack of accountability regarding regional policy decisions (specifically, the closure of the Põlva County courthouse and the SKA). The criticism is indirectly aimed at the Reform Party faction, which, despite having strong representation in Southeast Estonia, was unable to prevent these closures. This criticism is rooted in performance and political strategy, implying that the closures were a hidden objective during the election period.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed at the justifications provided by ministry officials who did not deem it necessary to review the provisions of the Child Protection Act, citing the fact that they have only been in force for two years. The speaker challenges this procedural objection, emphasizing simultaneously that the ministry did not substantively oppose the proposals. The criticism is aimed at political inertia, not at individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Draft law (447 SE) for amending the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia and amending other laws accordingly (establishing compulsory schooling) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is directed at the proponents of the bill and the government, criticizing them for inadequate financial planning and inconsistent decisions. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the incomprehension regarding the closure of a vocational school intended for students with special needs at a time when the need for support is growing.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The core conflict revolves around the legal restrictions and convictions put forward by the rapporteur, which the speaker considers unduly restrictive of Parliament's operational freedom. Criticism is also directed at the process of addressing the claim of unconstitutionality raised by the Isamaa faction's proposal, as they seek a pragmatic solution.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the bill's initiators, especially the Social Democrats, who are associated with wanting to impose a "loyalty check" on voters. The criticism is intense and focuses on the bill's illogical provisions (e.g., why is the right to vote necessary for Turkish citizens but not Norwegian citizens) and the unwarranted creation of uniformity.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary adversaries are the government and the Reform Party, who are sharply criticized for both policy (insufficient funding for the care reform) and their moral conduct. The attacks are intense, accusing the government of dishonesty and exploiting the elderly. Support for the draft bill is considered impossible.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main criticism is aimed at the coalition and the Reform Party, who are accused of violating the inviolability of parental benefits and seeking savings in "mystical" places. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's priorities, which are detrimental to families and regional services. Compromise is ruled out, as the speaker does not support the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main opponents are the government coalition and its leaders (Prime Minister Michal, the Minister of Defense), who are accused of cutting national defense and misleading the public about the purpose of the tax increases. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of inflicting "double damage" on national defense and abandoning the Põlva region. Their Social Democrat colleague Anti Allas is also criticized regarding the Võru shooting range issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law on the partial repeal of the Value Added Tax Act Amendment Act (489 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the implementation of amendments to the Land Tax Act, criticizing the methodology used by the state for calculating the equalization fund. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, pointing to the unfairness that arises when the state assumes local governments will apply the maximum rates.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

He/She strongly criticizes the opponents (including the representative of the Ministry of Social Affairs) for misinterpreting the content of the draft bill, accusing them of shifting the focus to topics that the bill does not address (e.g., banning abortions). He/She questions the credibility of the rapporteur and the ministry representative, asking whether they had read the draft bill at all. The criticism is primarily procedural and substantive.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism targets the actions of the government and the prime minister, particularly concerning the increase in bureaucracy and the way they are handling bills prepared by the previous administration. The opposition is focused on both policy and procedure, accusing the government of creating illogical solutions. There is also criticism aimed at the European Union for its inability to compete with China.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, against whom both procedural and personal criticism is directed. The speaker advises the minister to stop lecturing others and questions his knowledge regarding the location of a specific budget line. The intensity of the criticism is moderate but persistent, focusing on the minister's inefficiency in fulfilling his promises.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed against the Minister of the Interior and the government, who are criticized for both political impotence and incompetence in assessing security threats. The criticism is intense and covers both substantive aspects (the voting rights of state traitors) and procedural aspects (the availability of the draft bill). The Minister has been directly accused as a clear example of the state's powerlessness.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The standoff is directed against the budget decisions made by the minister and the government, specifically criticizing the unfair and non-transparent allocation of regional investments. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, demanding clarification as to why one investment (Võru) was prioritized over the other (Põlva).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the excise policy proposed by the government, criticizing it due to the policy's inefficiency and insufficient risk analysis. The criticism targets political choices that fail to adequately consider regional competition. The opposition is policy-based and results-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is strong opposition to the minister and his party colleagues, who stand accused of political inconsistency and abandoning their previous stances (for instance, concerning the parental benefit cap). The earlier rhetoric of the opposing side regarding needs-based support is also being criticized, dismissed as "empty words." The criticism is mainly focused on policy and procedure, demanding the disclosure of the underlying calculations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-08
Draft law amending the Blood Act (476 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the actions and accountability of the executive branch (the Minister and the Ministry), particularly concerning the ambiguity in delegating implementation activities and the repeated failure of the PERH procurement tender. The criticism is procedural and focuses on administrative errors.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The behaviour and credibility of government members

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur personally and his ethical conduct, highlighting an alleged conflict of interest involving the defense industry. The criticism is intense, focusing on his trustworthiness and questionable actions. There is also indirect criticism regarding the previous inaction of the former prime minister and defense minister in the context of 1.6 billion euros.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (426 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponents are the coalition and the Government Office, who are criticized for increasing bureaucracy and expanding the directive while simultaneously ignoring the concerns of stakeholders (family doctors, ITL, pharmacists). The criticism is strongly procedural and political, accusing the government of acting contrary to its promise to reduce bureaucracy. The Isamaa faction refuses to support the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is indirectly aimed at the current Minister of Justice's proposed policy (the importation of foreign prisoners), but it is framed as a question rather than outright opposition. The focus is on procedural and legal prudence, not on substantively opposing the policy itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The speaker, who is positioned in the opposition, is criticizing the government (or the previous coalition) for its inability to clarify the financial details of the security tax. The criticism is directed at the policy's implementation and the lack of transparency, directly challenging the minister's claim that the public simply misunderstands the concept of contributing to security.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The speaker is in opposition, criticizing the government coalition for the vagueness of its policy and its internal disputes ("you are even arguing within your own party about how to define its content"). The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the new tax plan's lack of financial substance and the unclear distribution of funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The main opponent is Infrastructure Minister Vladimir Svet, against whom a motion of no confidence has been filed. The criticism is intense and focuses on the minister’s ideological instability, particularly concerning a 2018 interview and his subsequent alleged display of patriotism. The criticism also extends to the Social Democrats and Lauri Läänemets, questioning the adjustment of their positions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the ruling coalition: the Reform Party (the Squirrels) and the Social Democrats (the Socs). The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the Reform Party of lusting for power and operating under the dictate of the Socs, which will lead to catastrophic consequences. The government is also criticized for misleading the public about the real purpose of the tax hikes, earmarking funds for "national defense" that never actually reach their intended destination.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

A strong backlash is aimed at the Social Democrats’ (SDE) position regarding voting rights for third-country nationals, a stance linked to the "red flag" and the protection of Russian voters. Criticism is also directed at the Reform Party’s political instability and the Kaja Kallas government’s previous controversial decisions. This criticism is rooted in issues of policy and trustworthiness.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The opposition is directed against the parliamentary majority and the Constitutional Committee, who are being criticized for fast-tracking the law and potentially handling it in an unconstitutional manner. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural violations and arbitrary decisions concerning tax rates.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Financial Supervision Authority 2023 Annual Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the government coalition and the bill’s rapporteurs, who failed to provide adequate answers or clarify the law’s impact. The criticism is both procedural (the absence of a drafting intent) and substantive (the mandatory nature of the tax increase and its effect on rural entrepreneurship). The speaker rules out supporting the bill "in any form whatsoever."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the government coalition’s procedural decisions, particularly the quiet approval of wind energy subsidies, which constitutes both political and procedural criticism. Direct criticism is leveled at the Social Democrats (Sotsid), who are linked to prioritizing wind energy. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, focusing instead on highlighting logical inconsistencies.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The speaker voiced concern over the pressure exerted by vague external forces and societal expectations ("which are being imposed upon us"), arguing that this threatens the impartiality of the courts. No specific political adversaries or groups were named; the criticism is aimed primarily at ideological pressure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and the Chairman of the Finance Committee. Criticism is aimed both at procedural violations (such as ignoring proposed amendments and poor management of sittings) and ideological deviations (specifically, supporting left-wing wealth taxes). The speaker calls the coalition's actions an "outrage" and stresses that the opposition must do everything in its power to ensure the bill is not passed in its current form.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (395 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic not to Recognize the Results of the Presidential Elections of the Russian Federation"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is directed at the government, which is being accused of inconsistency in foreign policy matters and procedural sluggishness. The criticism is policy-based, focusing specifically on the delay in adopting the decision not to recognize the Russian elections.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opposition is aimed at the government, the Ministry of Finance, and the parliament, all of whom ignored earlier warnings about the consequences of the tax increases. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the government’s economic failure and the ignoring of input from entrepreneurs.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill, questioning their rationale for restricting the parliament's role in energy decision-making. The objection is procedural and relates to the lack of oversight regarding major expenditures made at the government level (offshore wind subsidies).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is directed at the governing coalition, particularly the Social Democrats and the Reform Party, whose support for the draft bill is being called into question. The criticism is both political (making compromises only among themselves) and ideological, linking the bill to redistribution.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Language Act and the Public Transport Act (Bill 397 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the current state of affairs where language proficiency checks in the labor market are either non-existent or very minimal, as well as the government's rhetoric, which misleadingly frames simple professions (like taxi driving) as innovation. No direct political opponent is named, but the systemic lack of control is criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Interpellation regarding the suffrage of Russian citizens in Estonian local government elections during Russia's war against Ukraine (No. 624)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the minister/government, who is being sharply criticized for their alienation from Estonian society and the security sector. The criticism is aimed both at political inaction (the lack of a promised solution) and cynicism, ultimately calling the government's priorities into question.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act (387 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

Not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill and the leading committee, who are being criticized both for procedural haste and a lack of political consistency. Particularly sharp criticism is directed at former Reform Party politicians (Ain Seppik, Siim Kallas) for registering the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia back in 2002. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the bill's rapporteur and the minister, criticizing their alleged motives (budgetary compliance) and procedural deficiencies (the absence of an impact assessment). The criticism is policy-driven and centers on the draft legislation's ineffectiveness in incentivizing businesses and its inadequate preparation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The primary criticism is leveled against the actions of the Ministry of Justice and the Minister, accusing them of fast-tracking the bill (415 SE) without the required impact assessment. The opposition is both procedural and political, focusing on the lack of justification and inconsistency in the government's choices regarding legislative priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding pressure exerted by the European Central Bank on the Basel Committee (No. 628)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the European Central Bank's monetary policy and the actions taken by the Governor of the Bank of Estonia within the ECB Governing Council. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting the failure of the measures to bring inflation in Estonia under control.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is no direct opposition; the criticism is rather aimed at questions regarding the sustainability of future financing models and the decision-making capacity of future compositions of parliament. There are no personal attacks or criticism directed at political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the public procurement system, which prioritizes low cost over local production and is deemed unreasonable. Societal attitudes and animal rights activists (e.g., Nähtamatud Loomad) are also criticized for creating a distorted picture of food production by focusing solely on negative aspects. Furthermore, a disagreement is voiced with colleague Pärtel-Peeter concerning the appreciation of rural life, defending the viewpoint that the countryside is a good place to live.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (371 OE) "On the Formation of the Riigikogu Special Committee of Inquiry to Investigate the Circumstances of Business Activities Related to Russia Originating from Estonia During the War in Ukraine"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The objection is directed at the commission's position, which deemed the investigation method proposed by Isamaa unreasonable, criticizing it for the lack of a specific alternative action plan. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the inefficiency of the action, not on individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Competition Act and the Amendment of Other Associated Acts (384 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the solution proposed by the Ministry of Justice and the minister's views, specifically concerning the misinterpretation of the Chancellor of Justice's opinion. The criticism focuses on the procedural aspects of the draft bill, suggesting that the proposed special procedure could be slower and inappropriate for the legal system.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Initiate Drafts of Legal Acts Ensuring the Clarity and Predictability of the Development of the School Network" (285 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker casts doubt on the universal applicability of class-based funding, favoring flexible solutions. The criticism is aimed primarily at the system, which fails to account for regional specificities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation Concerning the Undermining of the State's Foundations (No. 523)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition’s stance is directed against the inaction of the ruler (or government) when it comes to idealizing and promoting traditional values. The criticism is value-based, pointing out that the previously idealized family model has now been abandoned.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (393 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the ambiguous provisions and terminology of the draft bill, not specific individuals or political groups. The criticism is policy-driven, stressing the need to clarify the scope of the law's application to prevent uncertainty.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Health on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the healthcare system (long queues, unequal access) and the way the minister has set priorities. The opposition is operating at the political level and is expressed in the form of questions that seek clarification and a longer-term perspective.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Question Regarding the Financing of Cultural Buildings of National Significance (No. 600)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary objection is aimed at the actions of the Culture Committee (namely, preparing the draft legislation and requesting the withdrawal of the interpellation) and the Minister's bid to gain delegated powers for adding new objects. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, centering on a lack of transparency, insufficient analysis, and the disregard for the will of Parliament.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM), citing a lack of capacity and failed planning. The criticism is policy-based and procedural, noting, for example, that the ministry had to hire an external academic (Aaviksoo) just to dissect the school network issue. The opposition is intense, accusing the ministry of building "Potemkin villages."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-22
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act (338 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the Culture Committee, which introduced the draft bill, and the government, criticizing the complexity of the chosen procedural path and the establishment of an unnecessary special regime. The criticism is heavily procedural, accusing the opposing side of delegating the exclusive right of the Riigikogu and creating an unreasonable system.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the government's policies, which have resulted in an unstable tax and economic environment and established overly ambitious green targets that undermine competitiveness. Furthermore, he/she questions the validity of the "greedflation" narrative promoted by bank analysts, suggesting it might be a case of "looking for a problem where none exists."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government’s claims regarding improved crisis preparedness, demanding clarification as to why improving the universal service at a lower price point was not considered. The objection is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the specifics regarding the necessity and impact of the legislative changes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main confrontation is between the government and the minister who introduced the tax bill. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the unfair impact the tax will have on large families. Furthermore, he criticizes the government's previous justifications for the necessity of the tax in the context of national defense, implying the possibility that the state will first tax and then confiscate heavier vehicles.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "On the Special Labeling and Sale of Insects and Insect-Containing Foods and Products" (222 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed at the ideological school of thought belonging to the bill's initiators, casting doubt on their understanding of consumer behavior and the actual impact of labeling. The criticism is aimed at the ineffectiveness of political solutions when attempting to break ideological trends.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act (124 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at a specific draft law (Bill 124 SE) and the ministry or government that prepared it. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, focusing on the lack of support from relevant agencies and the misallocation of responsibility to the wrong ministry.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Review of the Implementation of the "Fundamentals of Legislation Policy until 2030" in 2022

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction or inefficiency in implementing legislation, particularly concerning the restriction of access to public information. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, demanding accountability and concrete steps in the drafting of the law.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the current government—one in which the speaker's party is not involved—specifically questioning how transition fund resources are being utilized to support innovation and R&D. The critique is policy-driven, focusing on the government's perceived inaction or inefficiency during a period of economic hardship. The question has been put directly to the governing body, demanding accountability for the allocation of these funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Inquiry concerning the reliability of electricity supply (No. 590)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the service provider Elektrilevi, who is accused of misinforming consumers and the faulty operation of the system. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, emphasizing that such conduct is not reasonable.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the rampant and unwarranted classification of documents (No. 589)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is primarily aimed at the bureaucracy and government agencies (the Ministry of Finance, the Estonian Tax and Customs Board, and the Ministry of Social Affairs) for their lack of transparency and the misuse of access restrictions. The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing that information is being withheld from the public without substantive justification, even when the data does not constitute tax secrets or personal information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the wartime indirect fire capability of the Defense Forces (No. 72)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is directed against the actions of the ruler (the government), criticizing the procedural correctness of the 0.25% allocation decision and the basis for its four-year validity. The criticism targets the lack of clarity in policy and procedures, not the personal level.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-11
First reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Registration Act (106 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Direct criticism is not leveled against specific opponents or political groups. Instead, the criticism is aimed at the existing legal situation, which has resulted in the humiliation of families, and the question is raised whether this was the intent of the legislature.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
The 400 million euro expense line item written into RES

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main confrontation is with the ruling coalition and its leading ministers (Mart Võrklaev), who are being criticized for unreliable financial management. The criticism targets inconsistencies in policies and procedures, especially regarding the failure to realize a 400 million euro revenue stream and the breaking of promises. The opponent's actions are described as "confusion," which points to the government's internal uncertainty.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-08
Inquiry Regarding the Threat to the Independence of Press Publications (No. 345)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The criticism targets the government and the commission for their lack of clarity and potential failure to reach a consensus regarding the amendments to the Cultural Endowment Act. The opposition is procedural, focusing on the clarity of the issue rather than resorting to personal attacks, and seeks to resolve the confusion surrounding the content of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling