By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the specifics of EU climate policy, referencing carbon emission targets, ETS2, and LULUCF, and calls for an analysis of financing schemes and technological solutions. Furthermore, they are familiar with domestic financial management issues, citing the positions of the National Audit Office and the Chancellor of Justice regarding the constitutionality of the budget, as well as the budgetary confusion within the ministries (Education, Social Affairs, and Defense).

The speaker demonstrates proficiency in the legislative process and legal analysis, referencing the quorum required for constitutional amendments, the procedure for handling a presidential veto, and supplementary constitutional review. Furthermore, they are well-versed in security matters, connecting congregations under Moscow's jurisdiction with a political network that supports Russia's military aggression, citing European Union politicians and security institutions.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Education Act and its implementation, referencing specific sections that regulate the teaching of mother tongue and culture in basic education (a provision usually triggered by at least ten parents of students sharing the same mother tongue). Particular emphasis is placed on the complexity of finding resources and qualified teachers within local municipalities. Furthermore, the speaker demonstrates awareness of the procedures of the Riigikogu (Parliament) session hall and technical anomalies.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in social and healthcare financing, citing specific figures concerning the Health Insurance Fund's deficit (800 million, reduced to 400 million) and executive bonuses. The importance of evidence-based and research-based analysis in policy formulation is stressed, particularly in the context of family benefits.

The speaker asserts their authority regarding parliamentary organization and the procedures for submitting questions, citing their "very long experience as a Member of Parliament." They use this experience to prove that the phrasing of the question does not influence the content or quality of the response. Their expertise relates more to procedural efficiency than to specific policy fields.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the operations, role, and regulatory history of credit unions (CUs), referencing the 2010 legislative amendments and the context of European Union law. A detailed discussion is favored concerning the strengthening of supervision and the maintenance of competition in the financial sector, contrasting the issues faced by CUs with the damages caused by banks. Furthermore, comprehensive procedural knowledge concerning the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and parliamentary culture is presented.

The highest level of expertise lies in the interpretation of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and the Constitution, constantly citing specific sections and referring to the case law of the Supreme Court. They employ legal terminology and rely on the positions taken by the Legal and Analysis Department, especially during disputes with the Board concerning the processing of interpellations and draft legislation. Furthermore, they demonstrate meticulousness when clarifying the necessity of amending the laws governing citizenship and local elections.