By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker stresses the necessity of supporting the proposals put forth by other EU member states (Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria) for the review of detrimental regulations, while criticizing the Estonian government's failure to cooperate with its allies. Data regarding internal inter-party cooperation is currently unavailable.

The speaker stressed the Riigikogu's good faith and willingness to cooperate, noting that the parliamentary majority amended the law specifically addressing the shortcomings identified following the presidential veto. He is seeking broad parliamentary support, citing the quorum of 68 members as evidence of a strong majority position, which demonstrates the parliament's capacity to achieve consensus.

Not enough data

No data available

The speaker acknowledges the session chair’s framing of the topic, showing initial openness to dialogue, but subsequently presents a firm objection to justify their actions. Information regarding cooperation with other deputies or cross-party compromise is absent.

The speaker represents the position of the Isamaa parliamentary group and, on behalf of the faction, proposes rejecting the draft bill. While information on cooperation with other factions is lacking, the speaker positively references the previous activities of a Reform Party minister (Jürgen Ligi) to support the argument for preserving the operational freedom of the credit union (HLÜ).

Cooperation takes place both within the faction and with other opposition members of parliament, for example, when initiating amendments to the constitution (28 MPs from various factions). It seeks to find cross-party support on security and historical topics (such as the Flag Day of the Great Escape). However, communication with the Board/Presidium is rigid and demanding, emphasizing strict adherence to the law and avoiding compromises on matters concerning the rule of law.