By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu Q&A session, responding directly to recent developments, such as the meeting of EU member states and the forthcoming budget submission. They also reference recent meetings with ministers (Social Minister Joller) and are fully aware of the findings of the National Audit Office audit.

The speaker actively participates in the proceedings of the crucial, repeatedly debated bill, closely scrutinizing the voting results and procedural stages (presidential veto, amendments). This pattern demonstrates consistent involvement in parliamentary plenary sessions, where he/she provides summaries of earlier discussions and the progress of the process.

The pattern of activity is limited to participation in the Information Hour during the Riigikogu session, where both substantive policy questions and procedural observations regarding the organization of the chamber’s work are presented. There are no specific references to other events or meetings in the delivered speeches.

The data indicates active participation in the September 2025 plenary session, where substantive criticism and procedural questions were raised. Broader patterns of activity are absent.

The speaker is active within the framework of Question Time, participating in procedural discussions and planning to submit several questions. This indicates regular participation in exercising Parliament's scrutiny function and a desire to address a wide range of topics.

The speaker is active during the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), participating in debates on draft legislation, presenting the views of the faction (Isamaa), and requesting additional time for their address. Beyond the substantive discussion of the bill, the speaker is also actively engaged in procedural matters and the organization of parliamentary work, criticizing the inflexibility and the attendance of ministers.

Highly active during Riigikogu sessions, repeatedly raising procedural questions and submitting proposals to change the agenda, often at the very beginning of the sitting. Represents the Isamaa faction in the submission of numerous bills and interpellations, focusing on continuous oversight of the activities of the government and the board. Actively engages in obstruction, making proposals for the removal of items from the agenda.