By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder
Total Sessions: 97
Fully Profiled: 97
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker points to the Isamaa faction’s support for minor amendments (a 9–12 day deadline) and urges cross-party political consensus. He/She stresses that the only solution for altering the composition of the Electoral College must be a political agreement spanning various parties, which demands statesmanship.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker takes a strongly adversarial stance toward the government and demands an admission of errors, not a compromise. He/She refers to a plan to introduce an amendment to repeal the car tax, which points to confrontational legislative action rather than cooperation.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no indication of cooperation or readiness for compromise. The style is confrontational, focusing on highlighting the opposing side's flaws and obstructing their activities, proposing the suspension or repetition of the first reading due to the minister's incompetence.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The speaker stresses the necessity of supporting the proposals put forth by other EU member states (Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria) for the review of detrimental regulations, while criticizing the Estonian government's failure to cooperate with its allies. Data regarding internal inter-party cooperation is currently unavailable.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker stressed the Riigikogu's good faith and willingness to cooperate, noting that the parliamentary majority amended the law specifically addressing the shortcomings identified following the presidential veto. He is seeking broad parliamentary support, citing the quorum of 68 members as evidence of a strong majority position, which demonstrates the parliament's capacity to achieve consensus.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Not enough data
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The speaker acknowledges the session chair’s framing of the topic, showing initial openness to dialogue, but subsequently presents a firm objection to justify their actions. Information regarding cooperation with other deputies or cross-party compromise is absent.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker represents the position of the Isamaa parliamentary group and, on behalf of the faction, proposes rejecting the draft bill. While information on cooperation with other factions is lacking, the speaker positively references the previous activities of a Reform Party minister (Jürgen Ligi) to support the argument for preserving the operational freedom of the credit union (HLÜ).
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation takes place both within the faction and with other opposition members of parliament, for example, when initiating amendments to the constitution (28 MPs from various factions). It seeks to find cross-party support on security and historical topics (such as the Flag Day of the Great Escape). However, communication with the Board/Presidium is rigid and demanding, emphasizing strict adherence to the law and avoiding compromises on matters concerning the rule of law.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Data missing.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents the views of the Isamaa faction and proposes terminating the proceedings. He advocates for a pragmatic approach to the president’s objections, aiming to avoid unnecessary disputes and costs by prioritizing the clearer drafting of the law’s provisions. This spirit of cooperation is confined mainly to avoiding rule-of-law disputes, rather than seeking compromises with the coalition.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the historical continuity of his party (Isamaa) and its opposition regarding defense issues dating back to 2004. He calls on his colleagues to support the draft bill, which would grant the oversight function to the National Audit Office, seeking consensus on systemic reform despite the committee's opposition.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Information is scarce. The speaker instead emphasizes his party's (Isamaa) historical opposition and isolation during the 2004 convention debate, without mentioning current forms of cooperation.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker addresses their colleagues ("Dear colleagues") and stresses that certain issues (such as the inequality of the CAP—Common Agricultural Policy) are objective and have persisted for 20 years, meaning they are not solely the fault of the current government. This suggests a willingness to discuss long-term problems. Direct references to bilateral cooperation or a readiness for compromise are absent.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Demonstrates a pragmatic willingness to cooperate during the processing of the draft bill, supporting the clarification of the wording based on the proposals submitted by the Ministry of the Interior, in order to make the law more unambiguous and avoid further disputes. Reference is made to the consensus vote within the Constitutional Committee regarding procedural matters, which indicates a readiness to compromise for the sake of procedural clarity.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
While there is no direct information regarding cooperation, the speaker proposes clear alternative solutions (ending the discussion or taking a break) to resolve the situation, demonstrating a desire to resolve the procedural deadlock.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker points to other colleagues in the chamber who share similar suspicions about the motives behind Mart Võrklaev’s appointment, implying an indirect collaboration in formulating opposition positions. Direct communication, however, tends to be confrontational and demanding.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker points out Isamaa’s previous participation in the coalition, which demonstrates a readiness for cooperation. However, he highlights frustration with the current collaboration because the Social Democrats failed to support Isamaa’s proposal to regulate the price of the universal service. This suggests a limited openness to compromise on crucial policy matters.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The party offers the government assistance in tax reduction ("We will contribute"), though this offer is framed from an opposition standpoint, suggesting the government needs to rectify its policies. There is no direct indication of a willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the focus remains on the necessity of correcting the government's errors.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speeches focus on criticism and demands for adherence to parliamentary procedure, as well as opposition to the government's policies. There is no evidence of a willingness to cooperate or of seeking compromises with other factions.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation style is positive and agreeable, addressing the other party as "good colleague." The speaker clearly expresses consent ("I agree, yes") and uses complimentary folk wisdom.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is willing to compromise to ensure broad-based support for the constitutional amendment, even though they consider the compromise proposal imperfect from a security standpoint. They urge their colleagues to set aside party lines and the divisions between the opposition and the coalition, and support the joint amendment proposal. This demonstrates a pragmatic approach to achieving consensus on crucial national issues.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker expressed satisfaction at the Social Democrats' departure from the coalition. Support is being offered to the new government for initiatives aimed at reducing bureaucracy and cutting administrative costs, emphasizing that Isamaa supports these initiatives unconditionally ("without any quid pro quo politics").
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker calls for cross-party cooperation and consensus regarding the amendment of the constitution, stressing that this necessitates an outcome that transcends the coalition. He appeals directly to the personal understanding and conviction of the Riigikogu members. Simultaneously, he acknowledges the amendment proposed by the coalition deputies, which omitted the confusing delegation clause, thereby demonstrating a willingness to recognize constructive steps.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is primarily envisioned with local governments (KOV) and county associations, emphasizing the necessity of involving them in decision-making processes (school reform, regional administration). The speaker criticizes the central government's failure to establish good cooperation with local municipalities. The Minister is asked not to view the criticism as destructive, but rather as concerns that require answers, which signals a desire for substantive dialogue.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The speaker referred to the cooperation within the Isamaa parliamentary group when initiating the draft bill, and noted that the Constitutional Committee reached a common understanding regarding the government's concerns. He is pragmatic, emphasizing consultation with representatives of the electoral commission to ensure the feasibility of the changes.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses a desire for cross-party cooperation on crucial issues, citing the need to find common ground on demographic matters and criticizing the government for rejecting the establishment of a dedicated ad hoc committee on the issue. He stresses that the Isamaa faction is seeking a new solution and the opportunity to form a better coalition within the current parliamentary composition. There is a complete lack of readiness to cooperate with the government.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Not enough data.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Insufficient data
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Direct cooperation is absent because the speaker is in opposition and is posing critical questions to the minister. However, the speaker strongly urges that population policy be stable, consistent, and cross-party, transcending both the coalition and the opposition, in order to restore public confidence. He/She stresses that having the same politicians change the policy makes the situation particularly painful.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker points to previous successful coalition cooperation (Isamaa, EKRE, and the Center Party in 2019) during the launch of the regional sports halls project, emphasizing the importance of honoring agreements. In the current context, he operates as a strong opposition figure, scrutinizing and criticizing the government's actions.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It refers to the bill submitted by the Isamaa party aimed at bringing the State Budget Act into compliance with the Constitution, which demonstrates support for that party's legislative initiative. Direct cooperation is not described, but the support is clear.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to the discussions held in the Constitutional Committee, which indicates participation in collegiate legislative work. The current action is the formal posing of a question to the rapporteur; there is no direct information regarding the willingness to compromise.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Cooperation is evident within the faction, referencing the materials provided by colleague Urmas Reinsalu and the amendments proposed by Isamaa. In communication with the coalition, the tone is demanding, rather than compromise-oriented, focusing on rectifying procedural errors. The speaker attempted to find a resolution with the Chairman of the Finance Committee but concluded that the situation was intractable.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The collaborative approach emphasizes the need to revert to the traditional, decades-long negotiations between the government and the representative body of local authorities. The speaker considers this the proper venue for agreeing on strategic decisions. The current government's alternative negotiations are considered confusing and are being ignored.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Information on the cooperation style is scarce; communication has primarily been demanding and confrontational with the rapporteur and government representatives. Mart Maastik’s earlier stance is mentioned, which suggests he held similar views to his colleagues on certain issues.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The text highlights Isamaa’s prior successful resistance (during Kaja Kallas’s second administration) to granting citizenship to individuals with multiple convictions, demonstrating their capacity to defend their stance within the coalition. It urges coalition members of parliament to vote for the draft legislation, suggesting that this specific topic is not governed by the coalition agreement, thus seeking support across party lines.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation takes place within the Isamaa faction, with proposals being submitted on the faction's behalf. Instead of seeking a compromise with the ruling majority, they are demanding that errors be corrected and the law be followed, while offering the presiding officer an opportunity to bring the proceedings into compliance. There are no indications of cross-party cooperation.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker initiated Bill 527 alongside MPs from Isamaa, EKRE, and non-attached members (26–28 members), and claims they originally sought broad-based consensus. He is ready to compromise, offering to drop the bilateral agreements provision from his bill if the coalition drops the ambiguous registration clause. The aim is to merge the best elements of both drafts to achieve a legally clean result.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker asserts that they are seeking broad common ground and consensus in parliament, suggesting the unification of overlapping draft legislation put forward by Isamaa and the coalition. He accuses the coalition of refusing to cooperate and excluding the opposition from the bill's development. He stresses that consensus is achievable if the coalition partners would allow their members a free vote.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker values broad-based compromise and consensus, highlighting the previous land tax reform—which involved the opposition, the coalition, and stakeholders—as a positive example. The current government is being criticized for destroying this consensus and acting unilaterally.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker works in close cooperation with their faction (Isamaa), submitting amendments and delivering the faction speech on their behalf. They also support the voting on proposals made by other opposition members (e.g., Andres Metsoja). Cooperation with the governing coalition is poor, as the speaker views their actions as malicious violence and lawbreaking.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
In terms of cooperation, the necessity of a cross-governmental approach is stressed, urging the minister to agree with the Prime Minister on prioritizing regional policy across the government as a whole. The speaker views regional policy as a domain that should be integrated into the activities of every ministry (e.g., the Ministry of Education and Health).
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Data is unavailable. (The speaker is only engaged in intense criticism of the ministers in this context.)
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker referred to a similar question posed by another politician (Aivar Kokk), suggesting a certain awareness of colleagues' issues. The material presented contains no evidence of direct cooperation or readiness to compromise with the government, but rather sharp opposition.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The cooperative style is pragmatic yet cautious; reference is made to a previous failed coalition experience where the Social Democrats drew a "red line" on crucial security matters. Although they remain open to alternative solutions concerning the restriction of voting rights, they insist on concrete political and legal steps, rather than vague proposals ("shady talk").
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is acting on behalf of the Isamaa faction, demonstrating internal cooperation within the faction. Externally, the presiding officer is urged to show flexibility and adopt the proposal, which indicates a desire to find a solution in collaboration with the board.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents the views of the Isamaa faction and is uncompromising regarding the government's structural reforms, urging coalition politicians to think like statesmen and reconsider the decision. He/She supportively references the questions posed by other colleagues, demonstrating cooperation within the opposition. There is no apparent willingness to find compromises with the government concerning this specific bill.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate by expressing agreement with colleague Tanel Kiik’s position regarding the necessity of gaining clarity. This indicates a readiness to join other colleagues in resolving procedural matters.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers to a positive past experience cooperating with the Social Democrats when establishing the income tax system, describing it as statesmanlike conduct. In the current situation, coalition members are urged to support the bill initiated by Isamaa, appealing to their "strength and wisdom" in putting the nation's finances in order. Direct current cooperation is not mentioned; rather, the focus is on seeking support for the opposition's initiative.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker stressed their readiness for broad-based cooperation, noting that four parties (including coalition partners Eesti 200, SDE, and the Centre Party) are continuing consultations to achieve a result. He positions the Reform Party as the only obstacle, as it refuses to participate in the process, even though it claims to support the idea.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is sought with colleagues to ensure the efficient use of our collective time, and proposals are put forward for a vote, demonstrating a desire to secure majority support from the floor. This collaboration is focused on improving our shared workflow.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Details regarding the style of cooperation are unavailable, as the speeches are entirely focused on sharply criticizing the policies of the government coalition and the minister. The speaker expressed hope that the coalition partners would assist the Minister of the Interior and the Social Democrats, citing the necessity of a comprehensive security policy.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The address is a direct challenge and a question to the minister, demanding solutions and accountability; a willingness to cooperate or an attempt to find a compromise is not evident from the text of the speech.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The collaborative style demonstrates a degree of alignment with opposition colleagues (referencing Jaanus Karilaid’s question and continuing his theme). However, within the Riigikogu chamber, the approach is generally more confrontational, focused on holding the government to account and protecting procedural rules.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
Not enough data
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation is clearly intra-factional, as the addresses are being presented on behalf of the Isamaa faction. There is no cross-party cooperation, but the speaker is appealing to an external institution, expressing hope that the president will uphold the defense of the constitution and refuse to promulgate the law.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The style of cooperation is faction-based, strongly demanding the right of all Riigikogu parliamentary groups (including the Isamaa group) to participate in negotiations and to express their views on the prime ministerial candidate and the coalition agreement. The speaker appeals to the parliament’s right of self-governance to ensure greater participation for the parliamentary groups in making crucial decisions.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker is actively seeking cross-party support, calling on EKRE members to also back the Isamaa candidate. This demonstrates a willingness for tactical cooperation among the opposition factions, referencing the collective size of the "factions under the window."
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The cooperative style is formally polite, involving respectfully addressing the chair of the session and making a direct appeal to colleagues. There is no information regarding cross-party cooperation or the search for compromises.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational toward the coalition, but it refers positively to a colleague who shared similar concerns regarding legal certainty and the establishment of the previous land tax scale. There is no apparent willingness to compromise with the coalition; rather, they are demanding the suspension of the proceedings and the amendment of the draft bill.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the opposition and various interest groups (such as the support group for large families), but criticizes the government commission for its lack of transparency and refusal to consider substantive amendments. Acting on behalf of the Isamaa faction, the speaker proposes discontinuing the bill's proceedings.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker stresses that a coalition requires making agreements and compromises, and insists that these agreements must be upheld. He specifically criticizes the government for breaking the commitments stipulated in the coalition agreement (the income tax exemption for the average pension). Although he supports efforts to make the state more efficient, he shows no readiness to cooperate with the government in the current context.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The speaker addressed colleagues, appealing to them not to support the draft bill, and stressing the necessity of upholding the authority of both the parliament and the state. He referred to the Isamaa parliamentary group, demonstrating cooperation within the opposition, but urged coalition members to vote against their own parties.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Acting on behalf of their party (Isamaa), they submitted the only amendment proposal to the bill under consideration. Although critical of the measure, they offered a potential compromise (postponing the tax reform until 2028) should complete cancellation prove impossible. They directly appealed to members of the Reform Party for statesmanship, citing Isamaa's past willingness to compromise. Furthermore, they criticized a colleague who is constantly overruled on financial matters within their own party, suggesting that the colleague ought to switch affiliations.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the Isamaa parliamentary group's unified opposition to the draft legislation. He points to Isamaa's previous actions during the last parliamentary session, where the faction, while a member of the ruling coalition, successfully delayed the bill's proceedings, demonstrating a willingness to leverage internal factional influence.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speech reveals strong intra-faction cooperation (five Isamaa members submitted the interpellation), but a lack of cooperation with the governing coalition regarding the security topic addressed. The speaker emphasizes Isamaa's readiness to amend the constitution should Estonian security demand it, hinting that the governing coalition is unprepared to achieve the necessary broad consensus.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker expressed openness to finding a broad-based consensus on internal security matters (voting rights), noting that several opposition parties are also prepared to back the Isamaa initiative. He referred to attempts to convene representatives of various factions to identify common ground. However, communication with the coalition remains highly confrontational due to procedural disputes.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Despite the sharp exchanges with the government, the speaker expresses a willingness to compromise regarding the proposed solution for restricting voting rights. He emphasizes that Isamaa is ready for compromises and that other parties are not deadlocked in their positions. However, the coalition is being accused of mysteriously remaining silent and avoiding cooperation.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is focused on defending the positions of the faction (Isamaa) and emphasizing that they are among the initiators of the political statement. It defends the actions of Isamaa members against emotional attacks from other colleagues. The necessity of sharing crucial security information (the KAPO report) with members of parliament is emphasized to ensure informed decisions.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The current style of cooperation is confrontational, focusing on defending the rights of Riigikogu members and factions against the actions of the leading committee. Cooperation is emphasized by the need to consider the proposals put forth by experts from the Republic's Electoral Committee and the Electoral Service—proposals which the coalition has allegedly acknowledged but for which no solutions have been offered. The speaker requests that the Presidium be flexible and streamline parliamentary work, promising to deliver their speech in one continuous statement.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker adopts an oppositional stance toward the government but requests the initiation of a procedure to find a resolution, either via a statutory or constitutional amendment. Note is taken of the internal coalition resistance (Social Democrats) to the removal of voting rights, which is preventing the government from implementing its own coalition agreement.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
No willingness to cooperate is apparent; the speaker emphasizes the deep confrontation and the coalition's unilateral action, which has forcibly established the rights of the opposition. The situation is described as one where a "compromise" is born—the coalition's victory and the opposition's right.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the necessity of cooperation between Parliament and the government in order to provide the negotiations with the required political and budgetary support. This demand for cooperation was delivered in a critical tone, casting doubt on the government's ability to reach agreements without strong parliamentary backing.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the Auditor General, emphasizing that they are largely in agreement with him on the matter under discussion. This suggests a readiness to support the views of independent oversight bodies when those views align with the speaker's own criticism. There is no data available regarding inter-party cooperation.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The style of cooperation is critical and uncompromising toward the government's activities, particularly concerning the methods used in coalition negotiations. The speaker demands clear, honest, and definitive solutions to security matters, citing the necessity of following the example set by other European Union member states where the corresponding right is simply absent.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is cautiously exploratory, testing the Reform Party's readiness to delegate inter-factional representation. The actor involved is seeking clarity on whether the boundaries of cooperation extend to cross-factional representation.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker emphasizes that security should be an issue above coalition politics and parliamentary lines, not a bargaining chip. In the current context, the style of cooperation is confrontational, demanding the opposition show readiness to amend the constitution in the name of Estonian security.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperative approach is focused on presenting the views of the faction (Isamaa) and establishing unified opposition to the government's policy. The appeal directed at the coalition partners (Eesti 200) was intended primarily to persuade them not to succumb to government pressure and to drop the tax, rather than to seek a compromise with the government. This points to the need to convene the Council of Elders to resolve procedural problems.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker referred to previous coalition experience with the Social Democrats, noting that the liberalization of migration policy was scrapped at the time due to opposition from Isamaa. The current approach is confrontational, demanding clarity and a unified policy from the government partners.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
In procedural matters, he accepts the existing consensual approach but proposes improvements aimed at increasing efficiency. On the policy front, he emphasizes the lack of internal government cooperation, highlighting the Prime Minister's failure to take into account the Culture Minister's proposals regarding the tax exemption for vintage vehicles.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The collaborative approach emphasizes open discussion and the value of parliamentary work, noting that debate sharply highlights differing opinions. The speaker supportively references Tõnis Lukas’s previous stances on integration and workforce issues, demonstrating a readiness to find common ground with colleagues who hold similar views.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The style of engagement is confrontational towards the government, demanding clear answers and an action plan. Simultaneously, there is support for Isamaa’s specific proposal concerning the voting rights of third-country nationals, which signals a readiness to cooperate with opposition partners. A willingness is also demonstrated to utilize legal mechanisms (the Supreme Court) for resolving political disputes.