By Months: Vladimir Arhipov
Total Months: 13
Fully Profiled: 13
10.2025
17 Speeches
The rhetorical style is critical and insistent, employing both logical arguments (rising costs, system failure) and strong emotional appeals (inequality faced by children, the importance of safety). Figurative expressions ("a red rag to a bull") and rhetorical questions are used to cast doubt on government policy. The overall tone is formal (Riigikogu/Parliamentary) yet humane, emphasizing that security is not a commodity.
09.2025
85 Speeches
The speaker employs direct and emotional rhetoric, blending fact-based arguments with sharp criticism. They frequently use rhetorical questions ("Is this fair?") and draw sharp contrasts between the government's promises and the actual reality. The style is notably accessible and down-to-earth, relying on concrete examples from daily life while deliberately avoiding overly bureaucratic language.
06.2025
31 Speeches
It employs emotional and dramatic rhetoric, emphasizing the suffering of the people and the failures of the government. The approach is combative and accusatory, using phrases such as "you are tormenting people" and "opening Pandora's box." It combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, often addressing "the good Estonian people" directly. It utilizes eloquent comparisons and metaphors to provide explanations.
05.2025
40 Speeches
He/She employs an emotional and personal approach, often bringing up specific, real-life examples, such as pensioners in a cafe or during grocery runs. The rhetoric is frequently dramatic and accusatory, using phrases like "yet another blow" and "temporary fudging turned into permanent deception." He/She combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, often addressing "the good people of Estonia" directly. The style is straightforward and confrontational towards the government.
04.2025
14 Speeches
They employ emotional and straightforward rhetoric, particularly when criticizing the legal system. They pose many specific questions to ministers and demand clear answers. The tone is often critical and challenging, yet remains polite and well-reasoned. They utilize personal examples and references to local issues.
03.2025
20 Speeches
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining personal stories (such as the one about the Hiiumaa memorial) with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is direct and highly critical, utilizing figurative expressions like "headless chicken" to describe the government. Speeches often conclude with a call for concrete action rather than mere promises.
02.2025
21 Speeches
They employ an emotional and personal approach, often relying on specific examples and personal experiences. The rhetoric is frequently confrontational toward the government but seeks to establish a connection with ordinary people. Figurative expressions are used, such as "verbal acrobatics," along with references to the Soviet era. The tone of voice is often passionate, especially when discussing the division of society and people's rights.
01.2025
19 Speeches
The speaking style is direct and emotional, often employing rhetorical questions and personal appeals ("Why do you dislike the Estonian people?"). The tone is critically interrogative, yet polite, utilizing standard parliamentary forms of address. The argumentation combines concrete examples (Maardu police station, Jõhvi courthouse) with emotional appeals concerning the welfare of the people.
12.2024
18 Speeches
The speaker employs a direct and confrontational tone, frequently utilizing rhetorical questions and irony. They address ministers personally, switching between formal and informal modes of address. Emotional elements are introduced by referencing the plight of "poor people" and their personal experiences as a resident of Maardu. Speeches are often concluded with direct questions, demanding concrete responses.
11.2024
22 Speeches
The approach used is emotional and personal, often bringing up examples of the concerns and experiences of ordinary people. The rhetoric is direct and critically minded, employing questions to undermine the viewpoints of opponents. Fact-based arguments are combined with emotional appeals, especially when discussing pensioners, families, and local issues.
10.2024
10 Speeches
They use a polite but straightforward style, starting their speeches with traditional formulas of courtesy. They highlight specific examples and personal stories (e.g., a pensioner living in Sweden) to strengthen their arguments. They ask precise questions and demand concrete answers, employing a fact-based approach.
09.2024
24 Speeches
The tone used is measured and analytical, combining fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, particularly when discussing vulnerable groups such as children and pensioners. Questions are posed constructively, aiming to find practical solutions for bureaucratic problems. Figurative expressions are used occasionally ("golden circle," "sheep shears"), along with humor, when describing technical issues. A respectful tone is maintained even when raising critical questions.
07.2024
8 Speeches
The speaker employed a direct and confrontational style, posing pointed questions and demanding specific answers. He/She utilized emotionally charged comparisons (collectivization) and irony ("made grand promises"). The style was formal, yet simultaneously critical and challenging, focusing on facts and concrete examples to substantiate their arguments.