By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

He/She employs a direct and confrontational approach, posing sharp rhetorical questions to opponents. He/She combines emotional narratives (such as the example of the Russian girl) with fact-based arguments. The tone is critical and challenging, using personal examples to illustrate his/her viewpoints.

Employs an emotional and personal approach, introducing their family's connection to the subject matter. Contrasting imagery ("hole" versus "memorial") is utilized to achieve a dramatic effect. The tone is demanding and passionate, using phrases such as "this is a shame for the Estonian state," and appeals to both personal and national values.

The manner of speaking is courteous and formal, beginning with the traditional expression of thanks: "Thank you, esteemed Chair!" The questions are structured and analytical, focusing on fact-based aspects rather than emotional claims. The style is more investigative than argumentative.

The speaker employs a tactic of posing questions to gain clarification regarding the practical aspects of the proposal. The style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary forms of address.

It employs emotionally charged and confrontational rhetoric, combining it with concrete examples. The tone is critical and demanding, utilizing figurative language, such as describing the government as a "headless chicken." It appeals to both rational arguments and emotions, emphasizing urgency and accountability.

Uses polite forms of address ("Respected Presiding Officer," "Dear Minister"), but maintains a direct and critical tone. Poses specific, fact-based questions and employs rhetorical devices such as "the common person's understanding" and the vivid phrase, "figuratively speaking, you're breaking ground." Concludes honestly, expressing dissatisfaction with the answer received.

The speaker employs a direct and critical approach, posing a series of consecutive rhetorical questions to the Prime Minister. The tone is demanding and impatient, highlighting the urgency of delivering results through an emotional appeal directed at Estonian families.

The manner of address is polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary forms of address. The style is analytical and forward-looking, combining historical parallels with contemporary challenges. The tone is constructive and information-seeking.

Uses a polite and constructive approach, starting with an expression of gratitude and employing respectful forms of address. Presents questions in a clearly structured manner, combining the analysis of factual information with a future perspective.

The style of argumentation relies on questions, posing a series of consecutive clarifying inquiries. The rhetoric is polite yet critical, always beginning with the phrases: "Thank you, esteemed Chair! Good presenter!" The overall style is direct and concrete, focusing on the identification of practical problems.