By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov
Total Sessions: 10
Fully Profiled: 10
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker clearly opposes the revocation of voting rights for non-citizens in local elections, asserting that this is a political maneuver designed to eliminate competitors. They strongly support religious freedom and the continuation of integration programs, arguing that integration has, in fact, been successful. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting democratic principles and constitutional rights.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
This position strongly focuses on preserving historical memory and upholding the state's obligation to honor the memory of the War of Independence fighters. It emphasizes that the upkeep of War of Independence monuments reflects the state's attitude toward its past and its heroes. It calls for concrete steps from the government to restore the Hiiumaa War of Independence monument, stressing its significance for the entire Estonian nation.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker adopts a balanced approach to energy policy, considering both the potential for utilizing natural resources and the sensible development of the green transition. This position demonstrates a pragmatic attitude, avoiding extreme solutions and instead seeking a balance between fossil fuels and green energy.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker focuses on border policy issues, expressing concern about the possible consequences of completely closing the borders. The stance is cautious and human-centered, emphasizing the importance of maintaining family ties.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The commentator clearly takes a critical position toward the government, accusing it of indecisiveness and avoiding responsibility. They strongly support increasing national defense funding, specifically the indexing of compensation for reservists and the retention of experienced defense personnel in service. The text emphasizes the Riigikogu's role as a decision-maker, not a supplicant, and demands swift action on national security issues.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker adopts a distinctly critical stance on the government’s economic policy, highlighting the decline of the Estonian economy since the first quarter of 2021 and the deterioration of people's ability to cope financially. They express strong skepticism regarding the offshore wind farm project, voicing concerns about the use of taxpayer money and the prospect of subsequent higher fees. This viewpoint is clearly aligned with the opposition and is sharply critical of the government’s decisions.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker focuses on demographic policy and the topic of family benefits, expressing strong criticism regarding the government's slow pace of action. They emphasize the need for faster results so that Estonian families can "peacefully start having children."
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker is heavily focused on issues concerning Estonian national security and independence, particularly concerning the potential conclusion of the war in Ukraine. This stance is clearly geared towards long-term strategic planning, emphasizing the necessity of preparing measures to ensure Estonia's security once the conflict ends.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker focuses on tax policy issues, supporting the government's changes to tax policy as a positive step. They emphasize the need for tax relief for people so they can better manage their finances, which indicates that citizen welfare is a priority within the tax policy framework.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The Speaker strongly supports the establishment of a commission of inquiry into the Estonian aviation sector, demonstrating a clear interest in analyzing the failures of national aviation policy. His position is that Nordica's failure stems primarily from poor management, not a lack of funding. He also expresses concern about other major projects, particularly Rail Baltic.