By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

He mentions the strong performance of the Estonian economy as a crucial priority, but fails to disclose specific economic policy stances. The limited data available prevents a deeper analysis of his economic views.

It stresses that the funding of monuments should be a priority, irrespective of financial constraints. It acknowledges that funds are not unlimited, but demands emergency financing for essential cultural projects. It supports cooperation between local government and the state on funding matters.

The speaker expresses interest in an economically balanced energy policy, inquiring about options for utilizing natural resources and favoring a gradual approach to the parallel development of fossil fuels and green energy.

There is not enough data.

He criticizes the tax hikes and demands an increase in the subsistence benefit, pointing out that with the current 200-euro allowance, "you can't even afford to keep a cat." He expresses concern over the state's wasteful spending, citing the example of Nordica. He supports increasing national defense funding, viewing it as a necessary investment.

Expresses serious concern regarding the economy, highlighting inflation and the deteriorating financial situation of the populace. It criticizes state investments into the private sector (offshore wind farms), fearing the inefficient use of taxpayer money and subsequent higher costs for consumers. This demonstrates a conservative approach to public spending.

Due to insufficient data, it is not possible to assess the speaker's economic views.

Due to the lack of data, it is not possible to analyze the economic outlooks.

Supports tax policy changes that bring relief to people, stressing the need to improve citizens' economic standing. It also shows an understanding of the impact of tax policy on both state finances and public welfare.

Expresses concern regarding the efficiency of public investments, stressing that good governance is a key factor in achieving positive economic outcomes. It also voices skepticism about the economic returns of large-scale state projects.