By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

They employ an emotional and personal approach, bringing to the forefront the everyday worries of citizens. The rhetoric is direct and highly critical of the government, using phrases like "catching the crooks" and "the state is fleecing the people." They often provide practical examples drawn from their local experience and emphasize the importance of social responsibility.

The speaking style is direct and critical, utilizing rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the government's policy. The tone is concerned and accusatory, particularly when posing the question, "Has the government abandoned the goal of providing jobs for Estonian people in their own homeland?" It combines emotional and logical arguments, highlighting the worries of local residents.

The speaker's rhetoric is emotional and dramatic, employing phrases such as "panic attack" and "the cornerstone is cast on sand." They combine technical arguments with personal concerns, appealing directly to the "good Estonian people." The style is confrontational yet constructive—they do not propose discontinuation but rather seek improvements.

An emotional and populist style of rhetoric that utilizes direct addresses such as "good Estonian people" and rhetorical questions to amplify its impact. It combines fact-based arguments with a personal touch, employing figurative expressions like "Pandora's box" and "witch hunt." The tone is critical and cautionary, emphasizing the concerns of ordinary people.

It employs the use of questions as a rhetorical device ("Simple question: are we moving in the opposite direction?") and structured argumentation through comparisons. The style is polite yet critical, beginning with words of thanks directed at the presenter, but subsequently moving on to sharp criticism.

Uses polite forms of address ("respected chairman," "dear presenter"), but poses sharp questions. The rhetoric is inquisitive and analytical, employing logical arguments and concrete examples to support their positions. The style is factual rather than emotional.

It employs a factual and critical approach, presenting specific questions and figures. The rhetoric is straightforward and problem-focused, highlighting the inefficiency of existing systems. The style is formal yet critical, concentrating on the search for practical solutions.

It uses rhetorical questions and emotionally charged phrasing ("has the government given up hope"). The tone is critical and challenging, yet it remains within the bounds of politeness. It combines factual data with an emotional appeal regarding faith in the capabilities of the Estonian people.

A direct and critical tone is used when posing questions, always starting politely with "Thank you, esteemed Chairman/Minister." The rhetoric is fact-based and specific, employing precise figures and references to documents. The style is generally formal, but also incorporates emotional elements, such as "I was immediately shocked by this." An accusatory line of questioning regarding government policy is consistently employed.