By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

Actively supports anti-fraud legislation and demands stronger parliamentary intervention in cases of sluggish governance. Criticizes the committees' decisions to reject important bills. Emphasizes the need to provide the government with specific deadlines and guidelines.

Focuses on immigration policy issues, particularly the regulation of the labor quota. Takes an oppositional stance, questioning the government's decisions during the information session. There is insufficient data regarding the initiation of specific legislative bills or amendments.

The speaker is focusing on legislation concerning crisis management, particularly the EE-ALARM system and civil protection. He/She also addresses waste management regulations, posing specific questions regarding the division of responsibility between housing associations and local municipalities. His/Her approach is critically analytical, aiming to identify practical deficiencies in the existing laws.

It focuses primarily on opposition activities, proposing the rejection of draft legislation. It addresses amendments to tax laws, changes to the Employment Contracts Act, and issues concerning religious freedom. The emphasis is placed on blocking government initiatives and offering alternatives.

There is insufficient data to assess the legislative priorities.

Focuses on draft legislation concerning excise duties and the powers of local governments. Shows interest in the practical effects of legislative changes, especially on economic indicators such as inflation.

It focuses on reforming education policy and addressing labor market policy issues. It seeks answers regarding specific policy changes, especially the prioritization of vocational education and applied higher education. The restructuring of systems is the central focus.

There is not enough data.

Focuses on budgetary and financial matters, questioning ministers regarding specific draft bills. It actively addresses energy policy issues, referencing the national energy sector development plan. The focus is on municipal funding, particularly public transport and extracurricular education. It does not demonstrate the initiation of legislation, but rather the scrutiny and criticism of government policy.