By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

It emphasizes the necessity of public cooperation, calling on citizens to contribute to protecting the elderly from fraud. It supports the parliament's joint position regarding the provision of guidelines to the government. Furthermore, it demonstrates openness to collaborating with various organizations, such as the Harju County Council of Disabled People.

There is not enough data to assess the collaboration style.

The Speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate, stating, "we can move this to the second reading," and praising his colleague Peeter Tali by saying that "together, we can improve this law, which is so crucial for the people." He stressed that the Centre Party (Keskerakond) is not proposing an adjournment, but instead wishes to contribute constructively.

He calls upon other deputies to think together and support the positions of the Centre Party. He addresses "esteemed colleagues" and makes direct proposals for rejecting the draft legislation. The style of cooperation is more persuasive than commanding, although it is clearly motivated by party politics.

There is not enough data to evaluate the collaboration style.

There is not enough data.

He/She asks for the minister's opinion regarding cooperation with the Unemployment Insurance Fund, acknowledging the existence of the Fund's "truly strong leader." The approach is constructive, seeking opportunities for cooperation between various institutions in solving problems.

There is not enough data.

The reference to colleague Lauri indicates cooperation within the faction or the opposition. There is no demonstration of readiness to cooperate with the government; instead, there is consistent confrontation. While polite language is used when posing questions, the substance is clearly antagonistic. Signs of cooperation are restricted solely to internal coordination within the opposition.