By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

Criticizes the introduction of the car tax as an economy-damaging measure. They express concern over rising taxes and support stimulating the economy through tax reduction. They see the problem in the fact that the state and fraudsters are "fleecing the population" simultaneously, creating a double burden.

It strongly supports prioritizing the local workforce and investing in human capital retraining. It criticizes the allocation of resources toward importing foreign labor when local unemployed individuals and pensioners need pathways back into the job market. It expresses concern regarding job competition for local workers.

The speaker expresses strong concern over the tax hikes and excise duty increases, emphasizing their negative impact on ordinary citizens. He criticizes the government for increasing the tax burden on businesses, which ultimately gets passed on to consumers. His economic views center on protecting the taxpayer and preventing price increases.

Fiercely opposed to increasing the tax burden, advocating instead for tax cuts during an economic crisis. It supports the interests of businesses and workers, criticizing policies that diminish purchasing power and jeopardize job stability. The text stresses the necessity of social and economic certainty as an integral part of overall security.

It supports lowering labor taxes and reducing the burden on businesses to stimulate economic growth. It criticizes tax hikes and calls for clearer economic calculations regarding green transition measures. It prioritizes improving the business environment.

Supports lowering excise duty rates to curb inflation and is skeptical of claims that merchants would keep prices high even if excise rates were reduced. It criticizes the state's approach of transferring responsibilities to local governments without providing the corresponding resources.

It emphasizes the effective use of taxpayer money and the performance of state investments in education. It supports developing the local workforce as a more economically sensible solution compared to immigration. It demonstrates a pragmatic approach to economic issues.

Clearly advocates for prioritizing the domestic workforce in economic policy. Expresses concern that addressing labor shortages by employing foreigners could harm the opportunities available to local workers. Demonstrates a protectionist stance on issues related to the labor market.

Firmly advocates for a responsible fiscal policy, criticizing the use of borrowed funds for investments under deficit conditions. It demands precise budget planning and timely financing, especially in the public transport sector. It supports the retention of oil shale energy due to economic considerations, expressing skepticism regarding the economic feasibility of renewable energy. It emphasizes the importance of price stability and security of supply in energy policy.