By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The text adopts a direct and personal approach, citing examples from their own experiences involving a kerosene lamp and the "green package" agreement. The rhetoric is critical and skeptical, yet polite, employing questions to undermine the minister's assertions and demanding clear answers on behalf of ordinary citizens.

An emotional and passionate style that combines moral argumentation with factual claims. It uses rhetorical questions, historical parallels, and direct addresses to the people. The tone is cautionary and mobilizing, emphasizing the need for unity and criticizing the political motives of the authorities. The language is elevated and full of pathos.

The speaker employs a polite and respectful tone ("Esteemed Minister, thank you for your excellent presentation"). The style is fact-based and constructive, using specific examples and figures to support their arguments. The approach is more collaborative than confrontational.

The speaking style is emotional and direct, employing both irony ("That's pure acrobatics! Gold medal!") and personal memories as tools of persuasion. He/She combines technical arguments with emotional appeals, utilizing rhetorical questions and direct challenges. The style is confrontational, yet simultaneously attempts to underscore the necessity of social unity.

He/She employs a direct and inquisitive approach, posing specific questions to the ministers. The tone is polite yet persistent, using expressions like "an age-old issue" (or, literally, "a topic with a beard") to describe long-standing problems. This combines emotional arguments (the plight of low-wage earners) with rational solutions (a bank tax).

It uses interrogative rhetoric and direct communication, addressing the recipient as "dear presenter." The tone is critical and challenging, employing emotional arguments ("very fragile," "huge profit"). The style is direct and confrontational, but remains within the bounds of politeness.

It employs a courteous yet straightforward style, always beginning with the polite phrase, "Thank you, good/esteemed Chairman." The rhetoric is practical and concrete, utilizing real-life examples, such as the official—"the poor woman"—who has to cope with aggressive dog owners and their dogs.

It uses a polite and formal tone, beginning with an expression of gratitude and respectfully addressing the Prime Minister. The question is presented in a rhetorically structured manner, utilizing a clear contrast ("whether... or") to emphasize their viewpoint.