By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The rhetorical style is polite and formal, addressing the rapporteur with respect and employing appreciative phrases ("for a very voluminous, yet very important draft bill"). It utilizes an analytical approach, posing specific questions regarding the clarity of regulations and accompanying guidance materials. In socio-political matters, a moderate emotional appeal is introduced, emphasizing the welfare of children "in our turbulent world."

The rhetorical style is critical, sharp, and direct, employing strong emotional assessments, especially towards the government (e.g., "cynical viewpoint"). Rhetorical questions and ideological opposition are used to emphasize the injustice of the government's policies and the poor state of the country. At the same time, great respect is expressed for civil society initiatives and the work of the presenter ("hats off to you").

The style of discourse is direct and questioning, utilizing formal address ("Dear Presenter," "Respected Manager"). It combines a political challenge (the lack of alternatives) with an emotional appeal, emphasizing the tax's extreme unpopularity among the public.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on direct, probing questions addressed to the minister. The tone is concerned and emphasizes logical argumentation, referencing the negative trend in economic indicators and the problem of rising prices. Emotional appeals are avoided, favoring a fact-based approach.

The style is predominantly critical and passionate, employing strong emotional appeals, particularly when addressing social issues (children attending physical education class hungry) and the car tax (a red rag to a bull). Rhetorical questions are utilized, and human principles are emphasized, balancing value-based rhetoric with economic arguments (costs, wage increases). The speeches are formal, addressing the esteemed presiding officer and colleagues.