By Months: Andres Metsoja
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
8 Speeches
The rhetorical style is sharply critical, employing powerful metaphors and stark contrasts—for instance, pitting the "environmentally friendly" individual driving a Porsche in the city against the "environmentally hostile" person managing African swine fever with an SUV. The speaker strongly appeals to core values and the concept of proprietary responsibility, accusing the government of "pseudo-action" and "muddling the issue." The tone is formal yet emotionally charged, emphasizing the erosion of public trust.
10.2025
22 Speeches
The style is formal and critical, directed at the Minister and the Chair of the session. Logical arguments and rhetorical questions are employed to highlight structural issues (e.g., reliance on subsidies, fiscal policy flaws). The tone is one of concern, particularly regarding the long-term budgetary dynamics and the distribution of revenues among local authorities.
09.2025
18 Speeches
The tone is critical, exacting, and anxious, highlighting the public's sense of chaos and the government's perceived incompetence. It employs powerful emotional appeals, referencing the abandonment of rural regions and unjust taxation. Furthermore, it raises sharp rhetorical questions regarding the absence of governmental solutions and utilizes personal anecdotes to illustrate the sheer absurdity of current regulations.
06.2025
11 Speeches
The tone is predominantly critical and urgent, especially concerning energy policy issues, employing strong phrases like "the problem of shady dealings" and "total schizophrenia." He/She balances emotional appeals for the protection of rural residents with detailed and logical arguments regarding the legal framework and procedures. Sarcasm is used to highlight bureaucratic confusion and unequal treatment.
05.2025
16 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly formal, but it becomes highly critical and emotionally charged when discussing environmental issues (especially regarding the infringement of property rights), using phrases like "catastrophic approach" and "having to endure terror." He/She relies heavily on logical arguments, citing violations of the constitution, the principle of equal treatment, and the absence of impact assessments, thereby calling the government's accountability into question.
04.2025
14 Speeches
The speaking style is predominantly combative and forceful, employing strong judgments (e.g., "unfair tax," "strategic confusion," "we are a bunch of incompetents"). He balances political and economic logic with emotional appeals, referencing the lack of trust and the concerns of rural residents. He uses striking personal examples (an 8.6 million euro connection fee) to underscore the absurdity of the situation.
03.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and frequently critical, particularly when addressing the Prime Minister. The speaker employs robustly logical arguments, grounding them in facts, cost analysis, and regulatory anomalies (e.g., a comparison of the Finnish and Estonian energy markets). The tone is occasionally one of concern (regional anxiety) and indignation (the debate surrounding the gray passport), underscoring the necessity for transparency and proportionality.
02.2025
10 Speeches
The speaker's style is formal, analytical, and geared toward rationality, striving to be "driven by rationality." He/She frequently employs rhetorical questions to highlight political and procedural flaws ("Why have we arrived at this situation?"). When discussing the topic of pets, he/she utilizes detailed scenarios (e.g., a dog barking behind a fence) to illustrate the practical deficiencies of the draft law, ultimately expressing skepticism regarding the actual effect of the proposed solution.
01.2025
11 Speeches
The style is critical and at times emotionally charged, expressing frustration over bureaucracy and "stupid regulations," which fosters defiance toward the state. The speaker employs logical arguments and references to legislation, but illustrates them with personal examples and stories (e.g., the prohibition on cutting down a tree, lost hikers) to highlight the disconnect between central governance and reality. He uses sharp language, noting that some situations "make him want to swear" or that "something is totally messed up."