By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The style is formal and respectful, directed towards the session chair and the rapporteur. The speaker employs a logical and data-driven approach, posing a specific question based on statistical evidence concerning the commission's stance. The tone is generally professional and matter-of-fact, though it also conveys personal astonishment regarding certain aspects of the subject.

The style is analytical, rational, and formal, underscoring the desire to be "grounded in rationality." Rhetorical questions and references to procedures—such as the "touchstone of democracy" and the "gold standard of governance"—are employed to highlight political inefficiency. The speaker also utilizes emotional examples (the feeling of community abandonment) to clarify the origins of the opposition.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the Chairman of the Session and the Minister. The tone is a blend of recognition (regarding the successful desynchronization) and critical concern (regarding the faltering pace of Baltic cooperation). The speech concludes with direct questions about the progress of major initiatives.