By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The tone is critical and urgent, expressing frustration over strategic confusion and political inertia in the energy sector. A striking personal anecdote (an 8.6 million euro connection fee) is used to illustrate systemic problems, combining an emotional appeal with detailed regulatory proposals. The final conclusion is sharp, labeling the situation a "major failure."

The rhetorical style is interrogative and concerned, emphasizing the gravity of the regional balance issue ("it haunts us from every corner"). The address is formal and centers on logical questions pertaining to policy implementation, submitting several specific inquiries to the Minister. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the focus remains strictly on factual and administrative problems.

The rhetorical style is critical, inquisitive, and analytical, focusing on exposing logical contradictions (e.g., the necessity of subsidies for outdated technology). The speaker repeatedly poses questions to highlight governmental failures and market injustices, labeling the concealment of subsidies an "industry trick." The tone is formal and fact-based, while simultaneously stressing the necessity for "the people" to grasp the situation.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet it conveys strong criticism and confusion regarding the radical nature of the draft bill's content ("I am utterly confused"). Rhetorical questions are employed, and the violation of fundamental political principles is highlighted to exert logical pressure on the minister and demand accountability.

The speaker's style is critical and at times confrontational, accusing the government of lacking strategy and labeling them "incompetents." Both logical arguments are employed (economic paradigms, the use of borrowed funds) as well as emotional appeals (the condition of gravel roads, the exhaustion of residents in rural areas). The overall tone is worried and urgent, stressing the need for a sense of reality.

The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and inquisitive, focusing on pragmatic and logistical details (issues concerning administration, selection, and planning). The speaker utilizes logical argumentation and direct references to the concerns of local residents to emphasize the necessity of accurate information. The tone is concerned regarding the rapid pace of the process, but generally supportive.