By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the minister directly with a sharp question. The tone is critical and principled, emphasizing the importance of the topic with the phrase "a very fundamental question."

The speaker’s style is analytical, detailed, and critical, using arguments grounded in market and regulatory failures. They employ memorable and emotional language (e.g., "to run home to the top of a pine tree to talk") and criticize the state for lacking a "demanding master." The tone is formal, yet demanding in substance, and they also requested additional time to present their viewpoints thoroughly.

The rhetorical style is analytical, critical, and demanding, concentrating on logical argumentation and the identification of structural flaws. Specific examples (Tootsi-Sopi) are employed to illustrate the shortcomings of fiscal policy. The tone remains formal and is directed at holding the minister accountable for long-term planning.