By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The rhetorical style is analytical and interrogative, formally addressing the "Esteemed Rapporteur." Rhetorical questions and contrasting metaphors (e.g., "the wolves whole and the sheep eaten") are employed to illustrate complex legal dilemmas. The tone is concerned yet logical, focusing on bringing systemic contradictions to the forefront.

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and analytical, structured as a detailed policy inquiry addressed to the minister. The tone is investigative and centers on logical political levers, demanding clarity regarding key economic focus areas. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed solely on strategic planning.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical, even admonishing, particularly regarding the parliament's and government's failure to act as responsible stewards. Strong contrasts are employed (city vs. country) alongside emotional appeals (the loss of hope, value conflicts). The speaker uses metaphors (the fishing rod, emotional purchases) and accuses the Riigikogu of engaging in "pseudo-activity" and "talking utter nonsense."