By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The political position strongly focuses on the systemic clash between environmental policy and economic policy, which creates problems within the legal framework. The speaker emphasizes the contradiction where, in planning procedures, the environment should always outweigh economic activity, but practical decisions (e.g., the culling of wolves) appear to prioritize the continuation of economic activity. The position is value-based, stressing the priority of protecting the environment.

The political emphasis lies on aligning the government's ambitions (the Climate-Resilient Economy Act) with the framework of the 2035 development plan. The focus is placed on strategic economic levers and the maximum utilization of European Union support instruments for attracting capital. The political framework is strongly policy- and mechanism-driven, concentrating on the development of specific economic sectors.

The political position is fiercely opposed to the motor vehicle tax, deeming it unjust, inequality-creating, and deeply divisive for society. Criticism is aimed at the government’s strategic incompetence and the deepening of value conflicts between urban and rural residents. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of eliminating injustice and managing state assets responsibly, prioritizing the maintenance of existing infrastructure. Isamaa’s stance is the abolition of the tax, not its amendment.