By Months: Andres Metsoja

Total Months: 19

Fully Profiled: 19

10.2025

11 Speeches

The political focus is centered on the structural dynamics of the budget, particularly reducing the state's reliance on subsidies and bringing the budget deficit under control. Strong emphasis is also placed on the need to direct revenue collected from the motor vehicle tax toward roads, especially secondary and feeder roads, which are currently being neglected. The speaker demands clear plans from the government both for achieving fiscal independence and for the equitable distribution of local government revenues.
09.2025

16 Speeches

The political position is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government’s actions as generating chaos and a lack of public confidence. The main focus is the protection of property rights, emphasizing that "Property is sacred and inviolable," alongside the reduction of bureaucracy. The political framework is a blend of value-based (property rights) and results-based (life is getting more expensive, services are becoming less accessible) criticism.
06.2025

11 Speeches

The political focus is heavily centered on infrastructure projects (Rail Baltic, regional sports centers) and, crucially, energy policy. He/She is dead set against the 100% renewable energy target, viewing it as a strategically flawed decision. The speaker demands systemic transparency and equal treatment in industrial development, particularly concerning integrated environmental permits. The overall framework is primarily policy and procedure-centric, leveling criticism at the government's failed planning efforts.
05.2025

16 Speeches

The political position is strongly aimed at reducing bureaucracy, criticizing the size of the public sector, and demanding fiscal responsibility. The speaker most intensely defends the fundamental right to property, opposing the government-initiated restrictions on Natura areas (Bills 610 and 612 SE), which he deems disproportionate and akin to nationalization. The framing is strongly value-based (constitutional rights) and focuses heavily on economic impacts.
04.2025

14 Speeches

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s tax policy and its lack of strategic direction. The speaker firmly opposes the proposed car tax, deeming it unfair, and stresses the necessity of cutting the state apparatus rather than imposing new taxes. He supports strategic investments (e.g., the defense industry) and utilizing borrowed funds for infrastructure development, but insists on a clear strategy and proper consideration for local communities.
03.2025

7 Speeches

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing heavily on criticizing the government’s priorities, especially regarding the funding of infrastructure (roads) and cultural projects (Süku). The politician emphasizes the need to guarantee affordable energy and critiques bills that, while ostensibly aimed at reducing administrative burden, actually raise costs for rural residents. Their positions are strongly policy- and performance-based.
02.2025

10 Speeches

The speaker strongly supports strategic security, endorsing desynchronization as a crucial political statement. He/She criticizes the quality of governance, stressing that adherence to planning is the acid test of effective governance, and draws attention to the state’s contradictory actions (such as the conflict between wind farms and bog restoration). Furthermore, he/she criticizes the state’s inability to support local communities during major infrastructure projects, which generates significant opposition.
01.2025

11 Speeches

The speaker, representing the Isamaa party, strongly stresses the necessity of balancing nature conservation with human economic activity and the overall living environment. Key issues addressed include the reform of the hunting law (specifically wolf management), national defense governance challenges related to renewable energy, and the inefficiency plaguing the telecommunications market. The political stance is pragmatic, criticizing centralized over-regulation that ultimately disempowers citizens. He advocates for granting increased authority to the Environmental Board (Keskkonnaamet) to prevent damage caused by wildlife and calls for improved energy security management.
12.2024

16 Speeches

The speaker is a member of the Isamaa faction who expresses strong opposition to the motor vehicle tax, viewing it as an unfair levy that exacerbates regional inequality. He sharply criticizes the lack of transparency in the state budget and the government's operation as a "nanny state," while simultaneously stressing the need to protect property rights and legitimate expectation when pursuing environmental objectives. The political framework is clearly value-based and centered on the principles of the rule of law.
11.2024

31 Speeches

The speaker is strongly opposed to the government's fiscal policy, resisting tax hikes (specifically the motor vehicle tax) and criticizing the absence of spending cuts. Their views are deeply rooted in values and focused on outcomes, emphasizing regional equity, the stability of administrative governance, and national credibility. They express concern that the government's activities are undermining the economic climate and democracy, labeling the budget process "a framework of shattered trust."
10.2024

8 Speeches

The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s tax hikes and economic policy, which are described as a "one-way ticket" toward decline. The most prominent issues are the loss of competitiveness in the economic environment, the protection of local government autonomy, and the accessibility of social services. The speaker also emphasizes the fundamental defense of parliamentary democracy. The overall stance is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, focusing on the negative consequences of the government’s actions.
09.2024

12 Speeches

The political stance is strongly focused on regional policy and security, opposing government decisions that weaken regional internal security and defense capabilities (such as the closure of the Pärnu battalion and Paikuse college). He/She is skeptical of large, costly investments during economically challenging times and emphasizes the necessity of constitutional balance and community consensus regarding nature conservation and energy planning issues. The criticism is primarily aimed at the illogical nature of the policies and the government's poor performance in supporting rural areas.
07.2024

9 Speeches

The speaker is fiercely opposed to the current government, focusing heavily on resisting tax hikes (especially the proposed car tax), arguing that these measures undermine economic competitiveness and create widespread uncertainty. He emphasizes the fundamental importance of regional balance and the sanctity of every citizen's right to their chosen way of life, sharply criticizing government policies that are leading to the depopulation of rural areas. The overall political framework is strongly value-driven and focused on ensuring economic stability.
06.2024

7 Speeches

The speaker, who identifies as a member of the Isamaa party, is strongly opposed to the tax increases initiated by the government, particularly the motor vehicle tax and the amendments to the Land Tax Act. Their stance is value-based, emphasizing opposition to taxing lifestyles and advocating for the protection of property rights and regional balance. They criticize the government's policy as foolish and insulting to rural life, arguing that it fails to consider the specific characteristics of rural regions.
05.2024

5 Speeches

The political stance is heavily focused on criticizing bureaucracy and internal government inconsistencies that impede strategic progress, particularly in the energy sector. The speaker opposes ineffective taxes (like the sugar tax) that fail to alter consumer behavior, and stresses the importance of securing national competitiveness and clarity in planning. For him/her, developing the energy sector is a matter of heightened public interest that should take precedence over other economic branches.
04.2024

9 Speeches

The political position is clearly oppositional to the government’s tax policy, particularly the car tax, which is deemed irresponsible and oppressive to rural life. Strong criticism is also leveled against bureaucracy and regulations that impede seasonal work and major infrastructure projects (Rail Baltic). The speaker's approach is primarily value-based, emphasizing the lifestyle and sense of justice of rural residents.
03.2024

4 Speeches

The political focus centers on ensuring the functioning and credibility of the rule of law, particularly concerning alleged political interference in the administration of justice. The speaker demands explanations from the Prime Minister and supports parliamentary intervention through the formation of an investigative committee to resolve the resulting public controversy or crisis. This position is strongly aimed at restoring transparency and oversight within the legal system.
02.2024

4 Speeches

The political position is staunchly opposed to the government's tax policy (especially the car tax), highlighting the unfairness of taxing the lifestyle of rural residents. They also demand that the state implement internal austerity measures and find necessary funds within the existing budget (for instance, for teachers' salaries), rather than introducing new taxes. A significant focus is placed on protecting defense-related real estate and criticizing the West's passivity regarding sanctions policy. The overall political framework centers primarily on criticizing the government's activities and emphasizing value-based security.
01.2024

14 Speeches

The speaker is focused on closing legal loopholes, particularly regarding the transfer of lands designated for national defense, and jumpstarting the economy. He criticizes the government's inaction due to the lack of a clear economic plan and insufficient investment, stressing the necessity of achieving fiscal balance and economic growth. His political stance is strongly policy- and results-driven, demanding concrete solutions for issues concerning infrastructure and maximizing the value of national assets.