By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

At the level of the Riigikogu (Parliament), national/demographic and broader societal impacts are addressed; specific regional focus is absent. References are primarily made to the population, consumers, and the national economy, with specific regions or local projects rarely being mentioned.

It favors regional investments in Estonia's road network and stimulating the regional economy (e.g., Tallinn–Tartu–Pärnu). The focus is on the speed and safety of regional movement and freight traffic, as well as the potential for regional development that Rail Baltica potentially neglects. It also emphasizes the need to involve Latvia and Lithuania in cooperation across the Baltic region.

Central focus at the national level; specific regional topics are not mentioned, local or regional context is missing.

It proceeds through a strong regional context: Tartumaa (Tartu), Saaremaa and Muhumaa (ferry lines and price transparency), Toila municipality (regulations and crisis). Additionally, the Uikala landfill is mentioned as a topic concerning regional economy and environmental protection. Local issues and the central focus of regional policy are persistent themes.

Not enough data

The regional context encompasses both business activities in Southeast Estonia and the broader domestic and European-level impact; it is noted that local companies may face difficulties competing with Chinese enterprises. References are also made from Tallinn regarding the political context and decisions being implemented in the transport sector. Thus, the focus remains on both the regional and national levels.

The national level. The speech includes a discussion of the accessibility of Estonian healthcare and tax policy, as well as references to European countries, but the main focus is on decisions and government measures taken at the Estonian national level.

Not enough data

Regional differences (South vs North Estonia, the wage gap) are clearly highlighted, along with a discussion of the mandatory variations in tax rates set by local municipalities. Key focus is also placed on the effect of land tax on communities and the necessity of achieving regional balance.

Insufficient data.

Emphasis on regional and rural areas: Problems have been noted regarding the accessibility of county services, the lack of free county public transport, and the challenges of regionalizing healthcare and social infrastructure. Furthermore, it highlights the issue of the revenue base for local governments and the importance of regional policy.

No data available.

The report focuses heavily on regional policy, concentrating specifically on county-level services (post offices, bank branches, ATMs) and the sustainability of regional infrastructure. It mentions the unique characteristics of the Ida-Viru and Southern regions and emphasizes the need for increased action at the regional level.

The focus is at the regional and rural level: the revenue base of local governments, the regulation of land tax, the reallocation of county services, regional policy, and local investments. Emphasis is placed on access to islands (ferry prices, connections), the autonomy of county and local governments, and local social and service sectors.