By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The opposition spokesperson, speaking repeatedly during the plenary session held on those same days, delivers lengthy, comprehensive introductions and conclusions that alternately incorporate evidence and assessments. While the speech flow continues to gather concluding remarks, the primary focus remains the criticism of the coalition and the proposal of an alternative solution; the spokesperson frequently takes the floor immediately following other speakers.

It refers to previous discussions and studies (2000–2019), focuses on the plenary session on September 24, 2025, and recommends establishing an investigation commission and involving colleagues from Latvia and Lithuania. It emphasizes the need to continue the dialogue and proposes bringing representatives of various political parties to the table. It demonstrates consistent attention to the national and regional debate, repeatedly mentioning that the project has not been completed.

He/She spoke during the briefing session, referencing ongoing measures and the necessity of forming a working group. He/She emphasized the need for continuous analysis and implementation, as well as an exploratory approach to identifying the next steps.

This constitutes a series of interpellations from plenary sessions concerning the same topics; it refers to multiple interpellations and the need for ministerial responses. A continuous sequence is reflected in the texts: interpellations, references to ministers, and the demand for specific answers; the date noted is September 22, 2025. The narrative features repeated inquiries and reactions subsequent to the responses, along with the representation of regional issues.

Actively participates in plenary sessions and points to ongoing discussions regarding financial and budgetary matters; mentions that the drafts have been under discussion and cooperation has been underway since "the week we submitted them to the Riigikogu." Highlights the role of institutions (the Bank of Estonia, the Financial Supervision Authority) and various committees, and stresses the need for continued dialogue.

Regular participation in the plenary sessions held on the same day; reference is made to the procedural stage (third reading) and the continuation of discussions on technical and social issues. Mention is made of the discussion of technical problems in the context of the console and the functioning of state platforms; this demonstrates active involvement and a practical discussion of work procedures.

Shows consistent attendance at the information briefing and active participation. It presents several instructions concurrently on the same day and uses constant references to the same dataset (Eurostat/Euronews). The pattern repeats: questions are presented, a demand for accuracy is made, and the oversight of opinions and sources is emphasized. The behavior reflects a scrutiny of government policies and a desire for control.

It indicates that ongoing communication and criticism persist due to the rapid pace of the Riigikogu’s work and the quality of draft legislation. It mentions practices concerning draft bills implemented since 2023 and stresses the necessity of impact assessments. It emphasizes increasing public debate and transparency, as well as utilizing inclusion systems as standard practice, but specific intentions for the period have not been detailed.

Regularly submits and refers to inquiries, maintaining continuous scrutiny of government activities (e.g., land taxes, education). Demonstrates consistent participation in plenary sessions and provides periodic observations regarding the analysis of spatial disparities and ongoing issues within the education sector.

Participates in the plenary session, consecutively raising questions concerning RAB's activities, banks, and refinancing; emphasizes the necessity of continuous supervision and tracking progress.

Frequently speaks during a single plenary session on multiple different discussion points and also references the minutes of committee meetings; requests additional time and actively participates in the debates simultaneously. Regularly addresses the ministers and the coalition, employing various procedural means for extended discussion, and repeatedly proposes referral to the second reading and introduces amendments.

No data available

Actively participated in the plenary session on 2025-09-08; referenced previous inquiries and meetings with the parliamentary group, and emphasized the delay in ministerial responses. Highlights that the individual has repeatedly attempted to raise the topic within the coalition council and with the factions, thereby demonstrating regular, periodic activity concerning regional policy.

Repeatedly, interpellations and bills are submitted to various ministers, alongside regular proposals to amend the agenda and appeals to the presidium of the sittings. Frequent reference is made to the next sitting and to committee proceedings; active representation of the faction is visible in all rounds (speeches and inquiries during the period 2024–2025).