By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

A critical, fact-based speech that incorporates both questions and examples. It stresses the utilization of legal remedies and adherence to constitutional principles. The tone is resolutely critical, yet non-hostile. The speech is formal, rich with factual evidence, and solution-oriented.

The speakers' tone is combative and accusatory, often moralizing. They employ direct addresses toward the chairman of the session and others, fostering a critical atmosphere; the emphasis is on demanding engagement and accountability and addressing seemingly intractable dilemmas, rather than focusing on the agency of facts and individuals.

The tone is formal and constructive. A question-based approach has been adopted, emphasizing the potential for dialogue. The discussion addresses both factual and contextual aspects, carefully avoiding any irritation or personal accusations.

The style is formal and calm, directed towards the esteemed Minister. Specific questions are used, and explanations, along with logical and fact-based reasoning, are requested. The emotional tone is moderate, focusing on the verification of data and accountability.

A vocal analytical and critical style, incorporating questions and references to data; it employs historical or humorous remarks (e.g., the “Tallinn-Häädemeeste express”) and focuses attention on provisioning and risks. The tone is formal, but occasionally sharply critical, blending emotional rhetoric with fact-based arguments. The second address is extremely cautionary and prudent, stressing that the Prime Minister must not use divisive rhetoric concerning the Kremlin in this context; the tonality shifts to admonishing and morally demanding.

Based on questions and outlined accusations, combative and defensive in tone; employing formal, yet sharply critical rhetoric, and addressing the presenter and the protocol directly; the emphasis is on irritation and demanding control.

A combination of a combative approach and an empathetic appeal; it employs rhetorical questions, strong moralizing rhetoric, and sometimes sarcastic criticism directed at the government. It relies on both emotional and fact-based arguments, repeats key messages, and utilizes powerful, revelatory visuals (such as 'tax and lies' ledgers/diaries).

The tone is emotionally forceful and critical; it employs strong language such as 'negative precedent' and 'the state has failed to send signals to victims'; it combines the presentation of facts with ethical arguments and emphasizes the necessity for change; the goal is to provoke a response and effect change.

An emphatically combative and accusatory tone; employs emotional rhetoric to target "hypocrisy" and the contradictions within political coalitions; presents questions and appealing plans, but often focuses on accusations and confrontations; the style is dramatic and decisive.

The approach is combative and aggressive in style, utilizing list-based arguments and intense confrontation. A long list of criticisms and names of individuals is presented, which establishes a sharp, polemical tone. Rhetorical questions are employed, alongside the strategic highlighting of favorable elements (public hearing, evidence).

It focuses on a critical and calm tone, utilizing clear conceptual problems and hypothetical scenarios (e.g., [kaum], relative to a conservative party). The text includes questions ("Do you agree?") and clarifying explanations that emphasize the procedural aspect. The style is formal, argument-oriented, and emotionally moderate, though somewhat rhetorically cautionary.

The discourse is typically patiently argument-driven, yet simultaneously emotionally captivating, serving as a warning about potential dangers. He employs powerful metaphors, such as the opening of Pandora's box, and emphasizes the protection of fundamental rights. The texts feature a long, structured discussion delivered in an irritated, but not hysterical, tone; the inviting phrase, “Thank you!” is repeated, underscoring the desire to establish a clear moral and legal position.