By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Not enough data

The speeches take place on the day of the same session and are primarily directed at the Minister of Finance and the government; emphasis is placed on the lack of answers to questions and the demand for substantive responses. Attention is repeatedly drawn to the issues of draft legislation serving as preconditions, as well as matters of morality, but there is no description of a strong presentation of facts or frequent public activity.

Not enough data.

He participates in one plenary session and poses specific questions regarding the bill and the ministry’s figures. He focuses on clarifying the information and facilitating public debate, emphasizing the necessity of obtaining actual figures.

He frames himself as an actively participating speaker on the topic of Rail Baltic; he speaks at the same plenary session (16.05.2025) and refers to the sitting of the special anti-corruption committee and the assessments of the National Audit Office. He regularly notes that his position is cohesive and dependent on the government's actions, utilizing official sources to clarify his viewpoints. He demonstrates continued involvement in discussions on the same topic through two separate interventions.

Two speeches on the same day suggest heightened participation in the plenary session recording; the emphasis is on the transparency of the voting record and identifying roll-call votes. The speaker refers to the parliamentary procedure (first reading, votes) and requests procedural details.

The speaker is highly active in the plenary session, having spoken multiple times throughout the day and referencing previous weeks and events (queries, specific cases). This demonstrates consistent areas of focus (care homes, oversight, tax policy) and a desire for continued parliamentary debate and legislative amendments.

The speeches highlight active involvement in parliamentary proceedings and a focus on specific cases; the session of the Special Committee on Anti-Corruption and the hearing of the Prosecutor General are mentioned; the necessity of establishing case law and testing the interpretation of the law is emphasized, demonstrating an effort to advance judicial system reform.

He/She speaks actively on several points during the same session: referring to previous speeches and discussions on draft legislation, submitting motions for suspension and demanding public hearings; demonstrating a willingness to organize a broad-based discussion regarding Porto Franco and involve other political parties as well.

It focuses on the context of the information session, asks questions, and recommends a public hearing; it refers to events and coalition decisions that took place last time, and emphasizes the need to involve various political parties and former party colleagues; it shows consistent attention to topics related to corruption.

Throughout the day's discussions, the formal address evolves into a series of short, continuous interventions (a draft or outline, comprising multiple statements made on the same date). The speaker utilizes numerous questions and requests for clarification, demonstrating active participation in the plenary session, including highlighting points of protocol and procedure. They appear to be a regular, active participant who responds immediately to the minister's proposals.

The information refers to a single day, 2025-05-05, at the Riigikogu sessions, where the same background material and criticism directed at the Social Democrats is repeated. The speaker refers to committee discussions, the desire for information to be submitted to the special committee against corruption, and noted what was happening in state affairs. The recurring personal, factional commentary and the persistent demand for information regarding the government and the opposition are very obvious.