By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

It involves the actions of the Centre Party and parliamentary cooperation: it points out that the Centre Party has already filed complaints with the administrative court, and the Riigikogu has supported the position. It demonstrates a readiness to cooperate at the level of the Riigikogu and ministries in order to achieve an amendment or a repeal.

Not enough data

Emphasizes cooperation and dialogue; is prepared to negotiate and find solutions collaboratively, including balancing interests on behalf of small-scale farmers.

It does not refer to specific forms of cooperation or coalitions; it demonstrates a readiness for cooperation and requests information and clarification from the ministry. It rules out a direct cooperation plan, but emphasizes the necessity of a common basis for discussion.

Locally, it demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with the Latvian partner and stresses the necessity of ensuring improved collaboration and synchronizing timelines. Furthermore, there is a call to avoid divisive rhetoric and instead focus on constructive dialogue. This suggests a constructive, yet cautious approach to cooperation and dialogue.

Insufficient data

The text indicates a willingness for cooperation and dialogue: they wish to "discuss things jointly" and deliberate on the creation of a new law, as well as find solutions in collaboration with the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament). However, they are simultaneously prepared to strongly assert their positions and demand answers.

Seeks broad-based consensus and cooperation with colleagues across the various levels of the legislative body; refers to the anti-corruption commission and the need to deliver mutually anticipated results; and demonstrates a readiness to utilize the provision both to establish a precedent and to gather widespread support.

Expresses readiness for cooperation and dialogue (a public hearing concerning Porto Franco, to which all members of the Centre Party and various other parties are invited to participate); primarily, the parameters for cooperation involve the review of specific issues, although the overall tone remains critical and oppositional.

It proposes a plan to hold a public session involving all political parties and to invite former members, thereby demonstrating a willingness for multilateral scrutiny and transparent handling of the matter; however, it tolerates intense criticism while striving to maintain strong parliamentary control.

Not enough data

Quite critical, yet it demonstrates a readiness for dialogue: it seeks cooperation within the special anti-corruption committee and appeals to other factions to share information. It stresses the need for thorough discussion and inclusion, but simultaneously draws attention to the bill's procedure and potential compromises involving at least some of the amendments. It refers to non-monetary decisions and the responsibility resting with colleagues.