By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

They were an active participant and spoke on several occasions on May 29, 2024, concentrating on the land tax package and the funding of school sports. They also stressed the importance of supporting coalition partners and maintaining a readiness for cooperation.

The discussions refer to information sessions and public debates held during the speech; the election date (June 9) and a rapid procedure before Midsummer's Day are mentioned, indicating a tight schedule focused on the upcoming elections. It is noted that processing in the committees was rushed through the previous day (yesterday). The text reflects regular interest in and participation in the info sessions, as well as accelerated discussions.

Is an active plenary participant, delivered at least two speeches on May 28, 2024, and refers to the following points; demonstrates continued activity in the plenary sessions.

Actively participates in the discussion of social issues during the plenary session; delivered two speeches on the same day, May 27, 2024. One speech focused on support data and taxation for people with disabilities, while the second addressed traffic and bicycle safety, as well as training methodologies. This demonstrates a pattern of regular involvement across various topics and a high volume of varied presentations.

There is insufficient data regarding the frequency of speeches or other previous public appearances for this period. Not enough data.

Speeches delivered in the format of an information hour on the same day (May 15, 2024), presenting several separate viewpoints; recurring questions regarding the context and concrete steps for economic recovery; this demonstrates regular participation in information sessions and consistent rhetorical themes in economic policy.

During the same sitting, several shorter presentations are delivered, and numerous draft bills are addressed. The speaker refers to the order of the third reading and stresses the status of the plenary debates, demonstrating active involvement. This creates the impression of continuous monitoring of the situation and the raising of questions across various topics.

Regularly participates in plenary sessions and discussions, referencing recent events (such as last week's debates on the Isamaa draft bill and the subsequent vote). Demonstrates deep, current engagement with contemporary issues and approaches institutions (the Ombudsman, the Minister) to seek solutions to problems.

Participation in the plenary is highly emphasized and multifaceted: speakers address several topics consecutively during the same session, referring to the work of the committees and the stages of the third reading. Specific procedural questions are raised (e.g., separate voting on amendments, suspension of proceedings), and the timetable is mentioned (third reading next Wednesday) along with a political decision suddenly brought to light. Such active, detailed participation, covering all aspects of the procedure, is clearly regular and focuses on proceduralized debate.

Three separate addresses during the information hour on the same day (08.05.2024), focusing on the same topics: the increase in fines and state fees, and the rise in service prices. Explanatory memoranda and ministry analyses are regularly referenced. This demonstrates consistent, active participation in the information hour and systematic criticism of the government’s actions.

Speeches are scheduled for a single day (May 7, 2024) during the plenary session; the text refers to protracted debates and obstruction; it utilizes references to interpellations and past incidents as examples of the issues that are arising; it highlights concerns regarding both the pace of parliamentary work and the quality of legislative procedures.

Posing a series of questions during the plenary session, the speaker refers back to the previous discussion while searching for answers. This reinforces the continued focus on issues within the education sector (namely, the resignation of school principals and the fulfillment of promised teacher salaries) and emphasizes the need for rigorous scrutiny of the government's activities.

The parliamentary style demonstrates the consistent utilization of procedural means (such as recess and the Presidium) and a willingness to collaborate with various institutions (factions, Bishop Daniel). He stresses the necessity of increased cooperation and dialogue to facilitate discussions and the search for solutions.