By Agendas: Andrei Korobeinik

Total Agendas: 86

Fully Profiled: 86

2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, particularly concerning the car tax and the hike in VAT. The primary emphasis is placed on identifying alternative revenue streams, such as taxing banks' excessive profits, in order to mitigate the economic recession. The political framework is distinctly results-oriented, criticizing the government's failed economic policies and the resulting economic decline. Furthermore, protecting the rights of the opposition during the proceedings of the Riigikogu is a crucial topic.
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

A strong opposition stance focused on criticizing the failures of the government’s (Reform Party) economic policy and budget management. The main demands are increasing social benefits (specifically the subsistence benefit) and improving the transparency of public finances, particularly concerning the unused balances held by ministries. The political framework is heavily results-oriented and values-driven, highlighting the widening social divide and the decline in purchasing power. There is a call not to support the supplementary budget, effectively giving the Reform Party’s policies a red card.
2025-06-18
Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The political stance is firmly opposed to Draft Bill 645 SE and the Reform Party’s tax hikes, criticizing the government’s actions as deceptive and prioritizing the wrong things. The speaker stresses that during a crisis, it is senseless to take money from pensioners just to finance pay raises for members of the Riigikogu (Parliament). This position is strongly value-driven, centered on social justice and exposing the dishonest way the government presents its activities.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker's political position is manifested in the emphasis placed on adhering to the parliament's rules of order and procedural regulations. They question the legitimacy of the right to reply granted to the representative of another party (Eesti 200), which demonstrates a strong procedural and rules-based approach. Their focus is directed more toward the quality of the parliament's work than toward specific political substance.
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker supports the direction of the fight against money laundering but sharply criticizes the implementation of the draft bill and the incompetence of the ruling coalition (the Reform Party and Estonia 200). The political stance is strongly procedure-centric, emphasizing the principles of the rule of law and linking the government's policies to the three-year economic recession. He/She stresses the vital role of parliament as a forum for debate, contrasting this approach with decision-making behind closed doors.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on exposing the hypocrisy and failed economic policies of the ruling coalition (specifically the Reform Party and the Social Democrats). The primary objection targets the recent tax hikes, which are framed as benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the poor. Furthermore, the government's assertions regarding economic growth are dismissed as outright falsehoods. The political narrative is heavily results-oriented, stressing the sharp decline of the Estonian economy over the past three and a half years.
2025-06-05
Draft law amending the Road Traffic Act (regulation of e-scooters and mopeds) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker considers the regulation of micromobility devices and small mopeds to be a highly important issue, emphasizing the urgent need for its quick resolution. He fundamentally supports granting greater instruments (or powers) to local governments, but makes this conditional on the actual competence of the Tallinn City Government, presenting strong performance-based criticism. The political position is aimed at exposing the incompetence of Tallinn's ruling coalition (SDE).
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The speaker takes a strong oppositional stance, criticizing the economic management of the government (the Reform Party-led coalition), which, in their view, has caused a three-year economic recession. This position is heavily results-oriented, highlighting issues of economic injustice and inadequate state governance. They accuse the government of denying reality and avoiding uncomfortable questions, even employing Orwellian rhetoric to describe the situation.
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The political stance is strongly opposed to the economic policy of the current government (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), emphasizing Estonia's three consecutive years holding the last position in EU economic growth. The primary focus is on reversing the recent tax increases and implementing alternative solutions, such as a bank tax and progressive income tax. Attention is centered on the narrative of government incompetence and misleading the public, a narrative that is strongly performance-based.
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding the construction of Via Baltica (no. 734)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The political position centers on a strong demand for the four-laning of Via Baltica, justifying this necessity from the standpoint of both economic revitalization and national defense. The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party government for canceling previous infrastructure projects (such as the Centre Party’s 2030 plan) and for seeking an exemption from the European Union to avoid the construction. The overall framework is heavily policy-driven, highlighting the government’s failure to implement crucial infrastructure projects.
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The speaker is in strong opposition to the draft amendment of the Unemployment Insurance Act (519 SE), viewing it as an attack on the weakest societal groups. This is a value-driven position focused on social protection, emphasizing that the coalition lacks the popular mandate to implement such changes. The bill is opposed as the dismantling of the Estonian labor market and economy.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition has been voiced against the bill amending the Unemployment Insurance Act (519 SE), as it is set to increase societal inequality and harm the most vulnerable target groups. This stance is value-based, highlighting a lack of solidarity and criticizing the government’s policy, which has resulted in the introduction of a car tax and income tax on pensions. The political focus is centered on protecting social rights and resisting the growth of bureaucracy.
2025-05-07
Coping

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The political focus centers on economic well-being and social inequality. The speaker strongly rejects the government’s optimistic narrative, stressing that the average person’s prosperity has stagnated at the level seen seven years ago. Their core position is opposing the initiative to cut unemployment benefits, an action specifically targeting single mothers, seasonal workers, and young people.
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government’s inability to implement the "Estonia 2035" strategy and manage the economy. The key issues are the economic downturn and the state’s incompetence in the digital and justice sectors. The criticism is performance-based, highlighting the three-year-long recession and the constant postponement of actions, which is turning the long-term plan into a "farce."
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker expresses strong opposition to the current car tax, deeming it "totally unfair" and unconstitutional, particularly concerning people with disabilities and large families. This political stance is value-based, emphasizing social protection and highlighting the absence of adequate regional policy. As a representative of the Centre Party, the speaker promises to abolish the car tax in its current form should they come to power.
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The political focus is directed at the legislative process (Bill 570 SE) and the politician's accountability to their constituents. The speaker emphasizes the need to consult with voters and explain the voting results, especially concerning the opposition that arose within the committee. The position taken is rather procedural and value-based (representation), rather than substantive support for or opposition to the policy itself.
2025-02-18
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (535 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The most striking position is the strong support for implementing a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector, which is seen as a means of filling the budget and reducing social inequality. The political stance is strongly oppositional, criticizing the coalition’s economic policy (especially the car tax and tax increases) as a failure that has driven the Estonian economy into recession. The position is heavily results-oriented, contrasting the coalition's "faith" or "belief" with the real consequences of the economic downturn.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The political focus is on government accountability and the clarity of foreign policy, especially concerning the legitimacy of the Georgian government, noting the "confusion" currently dominating foreign policy. The speaker strongly supports initiating a motion of no confidence against the prime minister, while simultaneously emphasizing the protection of democratic norms against the labeling of voters. The stance is strongly oppositional and outcome-oriented.
2025-02-10
Inquiry regarding the deepening revenue gap among local governments (no. 675)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The political position focuses on criticizing the actions and political consistency of the governing party (the Reform Party), which is heavily performance-based. The core issue is the preservation of free public transport in Tallinn versus the promotion of regional policy, which directly challenges the Reform Party's stance. The speaker highlights the necessity for regional policy to finally be effective, thereby supporting regional development.
2025-02-10
Inquiry Regarding Bank Tax (no. 673)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government's economic policy, focusing on poor results and the detrimental nature of the Reform Party's actions (Estonia's recession is the second longest in the world). The platform is results-based, demanding clear economic metrics instead of relying on faith. Key issues include social inequality, raising the subsistence benefit, and implementing a bank tax.
2025-01-27
Inquiry regarding the mobile application eesti.ee (no 674)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The political position is strongly critical of the government's development of the e-state and its management of digital services, emphasizing stagnation and the failure to achieve the goals of the "Personal State" promised by the coalition. The criticism is results-based, focusing on poor project outcomes (e.g., a 2.6/5 rating) and the decline in the e-state's reputation. The speaker demands the restoration of Estonia's e-state reputation and a greater focus on developing the digital sector.
2025-01-15
Draft law amending the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Health Insurance Act (504 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The political position centers on strong opposition to policies that compel sick individuals to report to work under the threat of financial loss, stressing that this results in the spread of infection and a reduction in the labor pool. The framework is heavily outcome-based, blaming the Reform Party for driving Estonia into economic recession and lowering the standard of living. The speaker leverages this economic failure as an argument against proposed social policy changes.
2025-01-15
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Government of the Republic of Estonia to allocate funds for co-financing Tallinna Hospital" (498 OE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The political position is strongly focused on supporting major infrastructure projects, such as the Tallinn Hospital, Via Baltica, and the Haapsalu railway, viewing them as the key to overcoming the economic recession. Criticism is sharply aimed at the inaction of the current government (Reform Party, SDE, E200) and the postponement of crucial projects. The basis of this position is primarily results-oriented, emphasizing the government's failure to stimulate the economy.
2024-12-12
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Government of the Republic (523 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on their economic incompetence and avoidance of responsibility. It supports measures that would improve the state budget balance (reducing the expenses of the Riigikogu Board) and increase ministerial accountability for economic performance. The political framework is clearly performance-driven, emphasizing the length and depth of Estonia's economic recession (the Haiti comparison). It supports the draft bill aimed at amending the Government Act, viewing this as the first step in the right direction.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's 2025 state budget and economic policy, which is widely viewed as a failure (marking the third consecutive year of recession). The speaker rejects the unsystematic multitude of tax increases (dubbed a "tax orgy") and sharply criticizes the use of these taxes to cover budget deficits rather than for their intended purposes (such as national security). Emphasis is placed on the negative impact of the government's actions on the most vulnerable social groups, which provides the position with a strong value-based framework.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political position is fiercely critical of the government’s proposed security tax bill (512 SE). The main criticism centers on the divergence between the bill’s stated purpose and its actual content, arguing that the tax is intended to plug the hole in the state budget, rather than purely funding security. The resulting scrutiny is performance-based, accusing the government (the Reform Party) of incompetence and of creating the budget deficit.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution "Approval of the Consolidated Financial Report of the State for the 2023 Financial Year" (503 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political focus is on the management of state finances and budget transparency. The speaker is taking a strong stand against the increasing discretionary power of ministers to use budgetary funds without consulting the Riigikogu (Parliament). This position is procedural, emphasizing the necessity of parliamentary oversight and accountability.
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political stance heavily focuses on government accountability and strict adherence to budgetary procedures. Specific criticism is directed at the Minister of the Interior's actions regarding the carry-over of large sums and his refusal to provide explanations to the committee. There is also strong opposition to expanding ministerial authority to amend the budget by circumventing the directives of the Riigikogu, thereby emphasizing parliamentary supremacy. The position is both procedural and results-oriented.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political position centers strongly on identifying the underlying reasons for legislative changes and the intent of the legislator. The speaker is critical and questioning, seeking to determine whether the amendments are necessitated by overly strict requirements or if they are designed to facilitate the appointment of a specific individual (Kasemets). They emphasize the need for transparency in the legislative process, especially when dealing with proposed amendments.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political position centers on a critical analysis of the draft constitutional amendment (536 SE), specifically examining its implications for national security and resident loyalty. The speaker casts doubt on whether the proposed change will actually improve the security situation and demands clarification regarding why certain citizens holding long-term residency permits (e.g., from Ukraine, Moldova) are being disenfranchised. The position is highly inquisitive, requiring a clear justification for the underlying considerations driving these political decisions.
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The speaker adopts a strongly anti-government position, focusing on economic failure and policy paradoxes. The main emphasis is on blaming the Reform Party's policies for Estonia's prolonged economic decline, which is framed as poor governance. The stance is highly critical and results-oriented.
2024-11-14
Second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act and the Value Added Tax Act (mental health service) (500 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The political stance is strongly critical of the implementation model for the funding and accessibility of mental health services. It is emphasized that while the concept of self-help is supported, the budget includes reductions in mental health-related line items, which the governing coalition voted in favor of. The position focuses on the practical viability and effectiveness of the policy, raising doubts about whether the situation will improve or deteriorate.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Land Register Act (467 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The political focus is directed towards the procedural organization of the Riigikogu and the conduct of the presiding officer. The speaker criticizes the current practice of preventing amendments from reaching the floor, stressing the necessity of guaranteeing MPs the right to decide on their constitutionality. The position taken is moderately critical, centering on procedural justice and the efficiency of parliamentary operations. The political framework is distinctly procedural.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The political focus centers on the Rail Baltic project, which is currently viewed as being "stalled." One speaker voiced explicit support for Rail Baltic ("I support Rail Baltic"). Both speakers strongly advocate for the establishment of an investigative committee (460 OE), viewing it as a mechanism to ensure the project's realism and financial accountability, and to provide hope for its quicker finalization.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic's Government to lower the value-added tax on foodstuffs to 5 percent" (492 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is strong support for reducing the VAT on foodstuffs to 5% in order to alleviate poverty and the recession stemming from the current coalition's policies. The text sharply criticizes the government's actions, which effectively take money from the poor and pensioners (citing the security tax as an example), while emphasizing the dire state of the Estonian economy (second globally in terms of recession, and dead last among the Baltic states). The overall political framework is heavily focused on achieving social justice and improving economic performance.
2024-11-04
Inquiry regarding the departure of state institutions from rural areas (no 653)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political position centers on the critical scrutiny of the actions and decisions of state institutions in rural areas, specifically citing the closure of the Unemployment Insurance Fund office. The speaker calls into question the stated goal of cost savings, highlighting contradictory facts, such as the retention of existing staff numbers and the offer of free rental space. This stance is strongly critical of the justifications presented by the government.
2024-11-04
Inquiry Regarding the Spread of Narcotics (no 650)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political stance heavily focuses on the necessity of reducing drug overdose deaths, viewing this as a serious concern for the nation. This position is results-oriented, criticizing the lack of improvement in the current situation and demanding specific plans and accountability from the Minister of Health. The speaker stresses that this issue is urgent and requires immediate state intervention.
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The most critical issue is the catastrophic state of the Estonian economy—the only shrinking economy in Europe, ranking second globally only after Haiti. The political stance is one of deep distrust, focusing on the inadequacy and outright failure of the results achieved during the tenure of the Minister and the Reform Party. This position is clearly results-oriented, demanding accountability from the Minister and concrete methods for measuring future progress.
2024-10-22
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government regarding the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector" (487 OE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Strong support for implementing a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector to improve the state budget's fiscal situation and mitigate the economic recession. The political framework is heavily focused on improving economic performance and reducing social inequality, specifically criticizing the taxation of low-income individuals. It is argued that the tax revenue (0.5 billion euros) would allow for the reinstatement of the single pensioner's benefit and the cessation of taxing pensions. The political stance is strongly oppositional, blaming the current government for causing the economic downturn.
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Care Reform (no 649)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political stance focuses heavily on scrutinizing the financial impact of the care reform, particularly concerning the losses incurred by pensioners (15 euros, representing a 2% reduction in pension) and the revenues of local municipalities. Doubt is being cast upon the accuracy of the government's forecasts, demanding clarification on how the planned surplus and the pension reduction were calculated. The overall framing is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing the critical need for precise financial data.
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political position is one of strong opposition to the 2025 state budget draft, the proceedings for which he/she is proposing to halt on behalf of the Centre Faction. The budget is being framed as a measure that sows poverty and as the Reform Party's attempt to take money specifically from the poorest segments of society, highlighting the losses faced by pensioners and students. This position is strongly performance-based, criticizing the government's poor economic stewardship and the prolonged duration of the economic downturn.
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The political focus centers on the transparency of the security tax and the accountability of public finances. The speaker questions both the economic rationale for implementing the tax (which involves blaming previous governments) and the targeted use of the collected funds in the defense sector. The stance is strongly critical of the government’s actions, demanding concrete evidence and accountability.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The politician strongly supports the goal of increasing budget transparency but sharply criticizes the government's actual activities and the inconsistencies in implementing the draft legislation. The main focus is on defending the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) and the government's capacity to present a trustworthy and realistic budget overview. The political framework is results-oriented, concentrating on the government's failure to deliver the promised transparency.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The political position centers on the draft Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (510 SE), against which strong opposition is voiced. The bill is criticized for its detrimental impact on the economy, referencing a results-based framework. Additionally, procedural correctness is stressed, requiring the Minister's final statement.
2024-10-15
First reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the draft law amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The political stance is strongly opposed to the economic policies of the government (the Reform Party), emphasizing that Estonia's economic recession is due to failed domestic policy, not Putin's actions. The speaker vehemently opposes collecting money from the poor to benefit the wealthy, focusing on the inhumanity and failed outcomes of the policy. The criticism is aimed squarely at the government's actions and results, demanding that they look in the mirror and stop blaming others.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The politician has adopted a fiercely oppositional stance regarding the draft amendments to the 2024 state budget, demanding its outright rejection. This position is strongly evidence-based, highlighting the critical state of the Estonian economy (ranking second-to-last globally) and the "billion-euro shortfall" caused by the Reform Party's economic policy. The politician demands that real cuts be implemented instead of mere formal redistribution, and that unused funds be returned to the reserve.
2024-10-07
An inquiry regarding internet services offered to people in Estonia (no. 646)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The political stance centers on the high cost of internet services in Estonia compared to Latvia. The speaker adopts a strong, results-driven opposing position, rejecting the official explanation based on population density. He demands new and substantiated explanations from the government as to why the average price is several times higher.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act (432 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The central theme is the government's fiscal policy, specifically the postponement of benefits for the wealthy and the financing of this measure at the expense of social benefit recipients and pensioners. The political position is strongly oppositional, accusing the coalition of prioritizing the wealthy and exacerbating inequality. The framing is strongly value-driven and results-oriented, emphasizing the government's inability to admit its mistakes and adjust its program to align with reality.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income and amending other acts in consequence (463 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The political position centers on the technical and financial clarity of the tax law draft (Bill 463 SE). The speaker seeks to determine the actual tax burden, asking whether the higher tax rate will be eliminated or if it will be replaced by a component of the social tax. The focus is policy-driven and aimed at clarifying the specific content of the draft bill.
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act and the Tax Procedure Act (462 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The political position is strongly questioning and critical of the tax law amendments proposed by the government. In particular, the actual reason and necessity for changing the rules governing input VAT deduction (specifically, extending the period to ten years) are being challenged. The framing of the issue is policy- and procedure-centric, demanding clarification regarding the underlying schemes supporting these changes.
2024-07-29
Third Reading of the Draft Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA)

The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.

The politician is a strong opponent of the car tax, viewing it as a temporary win for the coalition that will, however, cause long-term economic damage and uncertainty. He criticizes the government for abandoning economic growth and stresses that tax hikes during a crisis hit the poorest people the hardest. His political position is strongly performance-based, focusing on the government's inability to prevent Estonia from falling to third place among the Baltic states in terms of living standards.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The political position is strongly opposed to the draft amendment of the Income Tax Act (443 SE), questioning its legitimacy. The criticism is aimed at the economic crisis caused by the ruling coalition and the subsequent misguided policy, specifically the redistribution of income. The stance is primarily outcome-based, focusing on the negative impact of the policy on local governments.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The political position is strongly against the car tax bill, stressing that it is a governance failure that will worsen the economic situation and increase social inequality. The criticism is framed both ethically and practically (based on values and outcomes), defending poorer population groups, such as people with disabilities, large families, and rural residents. The speaker claims that the tax takes money from the poorest, making them even poorer. The Center Party faction will certainly not support the bill.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The central issue is the question of pension indexation and the accurate attribution of associated political stances to the respective political forces. The speaker adopts a fact-based position aimed at scrutinizing the prime ministerial candidate's narrative while stressing political accountability. This stance is specifically directed at verifying the accuracy of the claims put forth by the government formateur.
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's proposed negative supplementary budget, which is deemed completely misguided and an attack on both national security and socially vulnerable groups. The Centre faction refuses to support the draft legislation, arguing that it fails to address the billion-euro deficit. They further highlight the government's economic incompetence and its failure to deliver on promises. The primary focus remains firmly on criticizing the government's overall performance and economic policy.
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The political position is strongly opposed to the draft legislation, which permits local municipalities to double the land tax and abolishes the tax exemption for land under one's home. The speaker accuses the Reform Party of breaking election promises and wrecking the economy, demanding the government's resignation. This position is framed as a matter of both political incompetence and detrimental tax policy.
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The political position strongly supports the creation of a nuclear energy option in Estonia, emphasizing the need for preparatory work and information gathering before a final decision is made. At the same time, strong opposition is expressed regarding the coalition's violation of procedural rules, referencing the "steamroller" tactics and the proposed amendments to the car tax. The focus is thus both policy-based (energy) and value-based (procedural fairness).
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Draft Act on Credit Servicers and Credit Purchasers (376 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The political stance heavily focuses on preventing debt bondage and protecting pensioners from the risk of poverty—a risk the speaker believes is worsened by the increase in income tax on pensions. The speaker criticizes the government's actions as insufficient and misaligned in terms of priorities, specifically pointing out its failure to establish a financial ombudsman and a positive credit register. Although the bill under discussion is supported, it is viewed as only a minuscule step in the right direction, underscoring the overall failure of the government's performance.
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The politician strongly opposes the introduction of the motor vehicle tax, deeming it economically detrimental and socially unjust. His stance is motivated by concern over the deepening economic downturn and the ability of rural residents and people with disabilities to cope financially. This viewpoint is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the necessity of protecting the poorest and most vulnerable groups in society. The politician plans to challenge the law both before the president and in court.
2024-06-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2024 Supplementary Budget (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The political position is strongly opposed to the supplementary budget bill, criticizing it as short-sighted and detrimental to vulnerable groups. The focus is on the government’s poor economic management (Estonia being the only declining EU economy) and the decision to make cuts at the expense of internal security and social services. The speaker frames the government’s actions as incompetent and prone to blaming the past.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The political position is strongly opposed to Draft Bill 364 SE (Motor Vehicle Tax). The argument centers primarily on economic performance and value, emphasizing the detrimental effect of tax hikes during an economic crisis and highlighting the social injustice, given that the tax funds tax breaks for the wealthy. The speaker demands the cancellation of the entire tax package, starting with the elimination of tax breaks aimed at the rich.
2024-06-05
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Crypto-Asset Market (Bill 398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on the economic downturn and the unattractive business environment that is driving away foreign investment. The speaker opposes crypto regulation, arguing that it will bring about the rapid end of the sector, and criticizes the cuts made to the construction of the eastern border through the supplementary budget. Their framework is clearly results-oriented, highlighting the government's failure to ensure economic growth.
2024-06-04
Third reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The political position is one of strong opposition to the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act (416 SE), as it takes money from the poor and deepens the economic recession. The policy is framed on a values basis (protecting pensioners and large families) and serves as a criticism of the government's poor economic performance. The speaker demands, as an alternative, the taxation of banks' excess profits in order to avoid burdening the poorer segments of society. The stance is strongly confrontational and forceful.
2024-06-03
Inquiry regarding the Directive on Platform Work (No. 629)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The political focus is on implementing the Platform Work Directive and ensuring social guarantees for platform workers. The speaker adopts a strong values-based position, contrasting it with "free choice" by labeling the latter as "modern slavery," and demanding state intervention to curb exploitation. This stance is strongly in favor of regulation and labor protection.
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The political position is strongly critical of the government and the minister for their inaction in developing the economy and e-government. It is stressed that the economic recession is due to poor tax decisions (the car tax, the VAT hike), and the development of e-government is slow, particularly concerning investments in artificial intelligence. The criticism is primarily results-based, focusing on the failure to implement promised reforms (such as the personalized state).
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The central theme is the unsustainability of the country's economic policy, highlighting the recession, the negative trend in reserves, and Estonia's last place in the European economic rankings. The speaker takes a firm stance, demanding quick and sensible decisions from the coalition instead of passive waiting. This position is strongly results-oriented, criticizing the government's inability to lead the country and its reliance on debt.
2024-05-30
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Crypto Asset Market (Bill 398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker adopts a strongly opposing position on the Draft Law on the Crypto Asset Market (398 SE), arguing that it creates excessive bureaucracy and threatens to stifle the sector in Estonia. The political position strongly advocates for economic freedom and opposes the expansion of the state apparatus, accusing the government (the Reform Party) of abandoning the principles of economic liberalization. He stresses that the state should allow businesses to operate freely to avoid budget deficits and accumulating debt.
2024-05-29
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Restore Support for Youth School Sports" (405 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The most crucial issue is the well-being and health of children, and the government must take concrete steps to improve it. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's current policy, accusing it of neglecting children's welfare. The political position favors direct support (school sports) over indirect taxes (such as the sugar tax), explicitly questioning the effectiveness of the latter.
2024-05-29
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (407 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic regarding the Increase of Support for Youth Extracurricular Activities."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker strongly objects to the coalition's method of passing the sugar tax, labeling it a "steamroller." They question the stated goal of the tax (children's health) and offer an alternative, value-driven solution: earmarking the tax revenue for hobby education and extracurricular activities. This stance is heavily politically motivated, emphasizing the need for investments that deliver tangible benefits for children.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for the Implementation of the Digital Services Tax in Estonia" (408 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political platform heavily emphasizes fiscal fairness and economic governance. The speaker firmly supports implementing a digital tax in Estonia to collect revenue from large corporations that profit at the expense of the Estonian people. They sharply criticize the government's policy, which takes money from the poor and pensioners while simultaneously favoring the wealthy, deeming it harmful and unjust to the economy.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political stance expresses strong support for the draft legislation that would lower the VAT on domestic fruits and vegetables to 5%. The central focus is rapidly shifting away from substantive policy and towards defending the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and the principles of parliamentary democracy, specifically criticizing how the opposition is being treated. The speaker positions themselves as a defender of parliamentary procedural rules and traditions.
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The political stance is strongly opposed to Draft Law 416 SE, as it undermines the economic security of pensioners and exacerbates inequality within society. It is stressed that the government has discontinued the extraordinary pension increases previously implemented by the Centre Party, which constitutes a fair measure. This position is distinctly value-based, centered on social justice and the protection of the elderly. The speaker asserts that every economic decision made by the current government is geared toward increasing inequality.
2024-05-08
First reading of the draft decision of the Riigikogu (403 OE) "Appointment of the Estonian Representative to the Control Committee of the Nordic Investment Bank"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The political focus is currently on the critical state of the Estonian economy, highlighting that Estonia ranks last in Europe for economic growth. The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance regarding the government's economic policy, backing economic rescue measures that the government refuses to pass. This political platform is clearly results-oriented and highly critical of the government’s inaction, positioning itself as the voice of common sense.
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (367 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, highlighting the state budget deficit and its overall failure. The main priority is the introduction of a temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector to secure state budget revenue and prevent unfair tax hikes. This position is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the injustice of taking money from the less affluent (pensioners, large families) during a crisis while simultaneously granting tax benefits to the wealthy.
2024-04-30
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's proposed tax policy, particularly the amendment to the Income Tax Act, which grants tax benefits to the wealthier population. The approach is both value-based and results-oriented, emphasizing the unethical nature of granting tax breaks during a crisis while simultaneously increasing ministers' salaries at the expense of pensioners. A call is being made for the government to take responsibility and resign, citing the positions held by Andrus Ansip.
2024-04-30
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the State Fees Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (417 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The central topic is the adequacy of state fees, particularly the high charge (250 euros) for expedited passport processing. The speaker expresses moderate skepticism and questions whether this price is disproportionate, bringing the legitimacy and justification of the policy into focus.
2024-04-29
Inquiry regarding the conflict between the motor vehicle tax and the Constitution and European Union law (No. 623)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker places emphasis on parliamentary procedural rules and the quality of the debate, criticizing the evolution of the culture of managing the session. The substantive political stance is critical of the government's approach to tax hikes, stressing the necessity of a comprehensive fiscal plan and national consensus. The political framework is primarily procedural and critical of the government's actions.
2024-04-29
Interpellation regarding the incompatibility of the motor vehicle tax with European Union law (No. 622)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy and economic management, accusing the Reform Party of creating an economic downturn and chaos. The speaker objects to the car tax, arguing that it disproportionately affects the poorest citizens and those living in rural areas, and proposes implementing a bank tax as an alternative. The framework of this position is clearly performance-driven, focusing on the government's failure to manage the economy effectively.
2024-03-13
Rule of Law

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The political focus centers on upholding the rule of law and adhering to parliamentary procedure (specifically, the Rules of Procedure and internal working order). The speaker sharply criticizes the referral of the bill to the wrong committee—specifically, moving it from the Legal Affairs Committee to the Economic Affairs Committee—and demands accountability and clarification regarding the lack of satisfactory responses. Their position is fundamentally procedural, emphasizing the need for full transparency.
2024-03-04
Interpellation Regarding the Temporary Taxation of Banks' Excess Profits (No. 595)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The political focus is centered on criticizing the economic recession and the unfair tax policy. The speaker strongly advocates for taxing banks' excess profits to prevent the tax burden from rising for lower-income groups (via VAT and car taxes). The stance is forceful, concentrating on the government's ineffective actions during a deep economic crisis. He/She emphasizes that the economic downturn in Estonia is exceptionally severe.
2024-02-20
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "On the Return to Ukraine of Children Deported by Russia" (375 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political focus is on the resolute condemnation of the war in Ukraine and the war crimes committed by Russia and Belarus, specifically the systematic deportation of children. The speaker emphasizes a value-based approach, demanding that the war must not be allowed to become routine, and strongly supporting sustained foreign policy pressure and concrete rescue efforts. It is stressed that Estonia must do much more and take the lead in consolidating allies.
2024-02-19
Interpellation concerning Drug-Related Deaths (No. 496)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The political focus is directed toward reducing Estonia's high rate of drug-related deaths, which is a concerning indicator within the context of the European Union. The speaker posits the hypothesis that cannabis legalization could positively impact the death toll, based on international comparisons. The stance is primarily policy- and results-driven, seeking data-driven solutions to improve the country's position in the rankings.
2024-02-14
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Electricity Market Act and other acts (termination of universal service and ensuring security of supply) (Bill 351 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political position is strongly geared towards protecting vulnerable consumers (especially the elderly) within the context of the universal service. The speaker criticizes the government’s inaction and delay, which has resulted in a monthly financial loss for poorer citizens, totaling approximately 100,000 euros per month. There is a demand for the adoption of the opposition’s (Center Faction’s) earlier proposal, emphasizing both political efficacy and social responsibility.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The political stance is vehemently opposed to the government's economic policy and the proposed car tax, highlighting the 3% economic slump and the historically worst position the country holds within the European Union. This position seeks to reduce the inequality between rural and urban populations, proposing a bank tax as an alternative. Rational economic decisions have vanished, replaced entirely by incompetent political maneuvering.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The political platform is strongly anti-government, focusing on economic incompetence and domestic policy failures that have driven the Estonian economy into the worst state within the European Union. Regarding foreign policy, emphasis is placed on an active and robust role in supporting Ukraine, spearheading the integration of smaller nations (Georgia, Moldova), and the necessity of a national reboot. The overall framework is primarily results-oriented, criticizing the government's activities as posing a security risk.
2024-02-05
Interpellation regarding the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments (No. 289)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The speaker indirectly opposes the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments, arguing that the price increase is caused by inflation, not by the activities of the hotels. The political focus is on procedural correctness, demanding the submission of the impact analysis referenced in the draft legislation. The position is rather policy-driven and moderately critical.