By Months: Andre Hanimägi
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
7 Speeches
The tone of the speech is serious, empathetic, and systematic, emphasizing the dignity of the elderly and their need for a lasting sense of security. He/She balances emotional appeals (loneliness, dignified aging) with concrete data and the political structure of the three pillars. In the second speech, the style is inquisitive and respectful, seeking real-life examples to better understand the situation of those receiving subsistence benefits.
10.2025
10 Speeches
The style is formal, critical, and interrogative, presenting sharp questions to the government regarding the logic behind their choices. The speaker relies on logical arguments and data to highlight the contradictory nature of the government's policy, particularly where it generates inequality.
09.2025
76 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and analytical, especially in committee reports where he/she presents balanced overviews of opposing arguments. He/She employs both logical arguments (references to legislation, lack of analysis, voting results) and emotional rhetoric (solving serious crimes, standing up for the Estonian people). Occasionally, he/She incorporates light humor or irony (e.g., mentioning Lauri Laats, the Prime Minister's "stand-up routine").
06.2025
57 Speeches
The style is sharp, critical, and penetrating, especially when criticizing the government's inaction (e.g., calling the closure of LPRS a "blunder"). The appeals are a mix of logic (referencing explanatory notes and analyses) and emotion (security, the future of children, the loss of funeral allowances). It uses rhetorical questions and contrasts (Tallinn vs. the rest of Estonia, faith vs. administrative power).
05.2025
25 Speeches
The style is formal, analytical, and inquisitive, often addressing esteemed ministers. The tone is pragmatic, but shifts to one of concern regarding regional policy issues and security matters, where he warns of potential dangers (more weapons equals more accidents). Emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and the necessity of comprehensive analyses to ensure that political decisions are quantitatively justified.
04.2025
11 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, yet simultaneously forceful, especially when criticizing government actions for procedural and moral failures. The speaker employs a balanced mix of both logical arguments (references to fines, statistics on fraud) and moral appeals (human dignity, a sense of justice). Detailed procedural reviews of the commission's work are presented.
03.2025
28 Speeches
The speech is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, as the speaker often fulfills the role of the committee rapporteur. The tone is detailed and logical, focusing on the content of the draft laws, the discussions of amendments, and the committee's voting results. Rhetorical questions are also used to call into question the motives of the coalition and the decisions of the government.
02.2025
11 Speeches
The style is formal and detailed when introducing draft legislation, offering comprehensive background information and procedural explanations, particularly concerning the committee's work. In political debates, the style is sharp and occasionally sarcastic, criticizing the Center Party's ability to deliver on promises and the hollowness of their rhetoric. The approach emphasizes statesmanship, the art of compromise, and the necessity of distinguishing political rhetoric from real life.
01.2025
2 Speeches
The style of the address is analytical and critical, particularly concerning the opposition's draft bill, which is labeled a "total lie" and a trivialization of the issue. The emphasis rests on logical arguments, citing specific financial implications and procedural deficiencies. The tone is formal yet sharp when criticizing the opponents' logic (for instance, the expectation that a person would buy five loaves of bread instead of just one).