By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal, neutral, and focused on procedural reporting, presenting the decisions of the Legal Affairs Committee and a summary of the discussion. The speaker employs a logical approach, clarifying the substance of the draft bill and the rationale behind the proposed amendments, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is professional and informative, beginning with customary greetings ("Thank you, Deputy Speaker! Esteemed colleagues!").
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, but includes a slight self-consciousness about the unusual nature of the topic ("how many people are looking at me strangely right now"). The speaker employs logical argumentation, emphasizing the economic benefits, and directly addresses a question to the minister, while simultaneously criticizing the topic's omission from the previous discussion.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The style adopted in the Riigikogu chamber is interrogative, demanding, and at times sharp, particularly concerning the substantive quality of the responses. The speaker criticizes those responding who merely read prepared texts and condemns the "political fluff," insisting on a focus on the content of the draft bill. The overall tone is well-argued, stressing the importance of analysis and facts.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The rhetorical style is analytical and critical, highlighting procedural flaws and the erosion of trust. It employs both logical arguments (referencing the Labour Inspectorate, the National Audit Office, and fines) and a strong moral appeal, especially concerning human rights violations and the public sense of justice (the Pihlakodu case). The tone is predominantly concerned and demanding, urging substantive analysis and engagement.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is respectful and professional, addressing the Chancellor of Justice directly to find a solution. The tone is concerned regarding the referral of citizens to the administrative court, emphasizing the need for a logical and legislative amendment. The speaker uses a direct question format to seek legal advice on how to change the law so that the modification is permanent and legally valid.